Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form -- most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! Was a bee (talk) 09:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Neuron Doc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to restore Category:Neuroscience to Gyrification. It is the parent category and is already included when you add Category:Developmental neuroscience. It will continue to be removed because it is redundant. You can read more about categorization at Wikipedia:Categorization#Categorizing pages and Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, User:Neuron Doc has reverted my edits at this and this also. You can't categorize a page under the parent and daughter categories at the same time. Medicine and Biology categories are also very broad categories, they should remain always as empty as possible. Please be specific when you categorize. Best Regards,--Brainist (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the parent categories from those two article as well for the same reasons.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fair enough on this page, since Gyrification is purely a developmental phenomenon. However, for the page "Neurogenesis" it must be on the general Neuroscience category. The reason is that Neurogenesis is a process that occurs *both* during development as well as throughout life, as described in the article, so listing it under "Developmental Neuroscience" would then be incorrect. I'm going to change that category back to Neuroscience, and I will eliminate the Developmental Neuroscience category. As per the Dos and Don'ts of Wikipedia, the category should be the most specific one and Neuroscience is it. Best. NeuronDoc.