Talk:Eega: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Eega/archive1 |
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Eega/archive1 |
||
|action1result=reviewed |
|action1result=reviewed |
||
|action1oldid=721637959 |
|||
|action2=FAC |
|action2=FAC |
||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
|action3link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Eega/archive2 |
|action3link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Eega/archive2 |
||
|action3result=reviewed |
|action3result=reviewed |
||
|action3oldid=736162374 |
|||
|action4=FAC |
|action4=FAC |
Revision as of 09:29, 7 January 2017
Eega is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Film: Indian FA‑class | ||||||||||
|
India: Andhra Pradesh / Tamil Nadu / Cinema FA‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
File:Eega movie 2012.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Eega movie 2012.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC) |
File:Eega-First-Look-Poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Eega-First-Look-Poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Eega-First-Look-Poster.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
Rajamouli’s statement about Megastar Chiru’s film !!
Rajamouli’s statement about Megastar Chiru’s film !! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaianu (talk • contribs) 05:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 14 July 2012
Tollyhub.com gave 4/5 star rating for Eega - Source : http://tollyhub.com/eega-movie-review/
Tollyhub.com article on eega records and collections. Source : http://tollyhub.com/eega-collections-records/
Ashezreinz (talk) 15:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC) Eega first week collections — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiarocks08 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. It's not clear to me that Tollyhub.com meets Wikipedia guidelines for external links or notability. I'd prefer to see clear consensus to include it before adding. Rivertorch (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
EEGA 21 DAYS BOX OFFICE COLLECTIONS
21 DAYS BOX OFFICE COLLECTIONS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.203.104.191 (talk) 04:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Dead link. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 11:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC).
Plot is too detailed and reveals even the climax
I strongly believe that Plot section is far too detailed. Also it should be edited to make sure climax is not revealed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikalp74 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
The movie has crossed it's 100 days also and revealing the climax is not wrong. If the movie is released just a few days ago then the plot shouln't be added. Raghusri (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Removal of Tamil name
User:Murrallli, please explain your position. Here is the previous discussion of this topic.Talk:Naan Ee. Also kindly explain why you remove any reference directed to South Indian cinema. Thanks!-- Dravidian Hero 19:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Two films, two different posters
Wikipedia:NFCC#3a doesn't apply here as this article covers two separate films, which have been merged to avoid duplicate content in separate film articles. So 1 film = 1 poster = minimal usage.-- Dravidian Hero 10:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Your opinion is right Mr. Dravidian :), but the two posters containing image file was deleted by admin. See here : Merged file. Regards, Raghusri (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I've reverted the image again based on expert consensus: Raghusri, me and Murrallli-- Dravidian Hero 13:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
then why dont u both split the two articles eega and naani???? why on earth u merge the articles and fight for image??? Murrallli (talk) 14:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Merging was decided at Talk:Naan Ee.-- Dravidian Hero 14:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eega. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.raagalahari.com/news/11417/eegas-1st-schedule-makes-producer-throw-a-party.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)