Ok, I've gotten the format of the next RFARB mostly ready to go with minimal further editing necessary. User:Amerique/RFARB2.0 I would like to open the question of whether we should file this week to further discussion on this page, as UCRGrad himself seems to have suddenly become absent. I for one am ready to go to the ARBCOM now, but would like UCRGrad to have the opportunity to defend himself. UCRGrad or Insert-Belltower can also comment here on this if they want to.--Amerique 02:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it would do any good to file an RfArb against an editor who is not present and has not present for about a week. If he shows up again and continues his activities then let's press ahead. But right now, without UCRGrad's presence in Wikipedia, the issue is moot. The article is finally moving in a positive direction and into compliance with Wikipedia policies and that's the important thing, right? --ElKevbo 02:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur.--Amerique 03:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above. I've also followed your suggestions, Amerique. starkt 04:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After reading criticisms of my attempts to remove (and keep out) POV material in the article by various editors (ElKevbo, GeorgeLouis, Szyslak and Danny Lilithborne), I've decided to no longer participate in any complaints against UCRGrad and Insert-Belltower. You can see my reasons in the UCR article discussion page ("Overall NPOV Status" and "Article Un-Protected"). starkt 05:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not planning to do much editing of the UCR article in the near future. I might come back later.

I've learned that sometimes, despite one's best effort, you have to bend over and take the Belltower; the porno music starts. "Peeep Bohh Chicka Bow Wooow."

Peace and Love, my fellow WOLVERINE!! Insert-Belltower 17:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I tried to archive your user talk page, but it seems that you have an error in your Werdnabot directive that prevented me from correctly archiving your User talk page. Please review this error, or contact Werdna648 for assistance. Werdnabot ^(DNBF)/_T\^C 04:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC) Template:AMA alerts[reply]

Hello Amerique, If you can go to the WP:AMARQ page and take a look at this case, mahawiki (talk) on belgaum belgaum_district. If you can't take it just post below where it now says pending. Æon ^{Insanity Now!}_EA! 18:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding my request.I dont seem to have any 'personal' problems with the editors with whom I have differences about Belgaum and Belgaum_district articles.Fortuntely Indian user Aksi_Great and sunder have intervened and solved the problem in a considerable way.We seem to have cooled off but I shall still request u to keep a look on these article as I am extremely concerned about POV of Border dispute sub-sectiom.Since u have no information about it,u r most likely to be neutral and 'understand' where POV is being disrupted.The other users contesting for these article are expert in wiki's policies and they take me to a ride by wisely framing lingo in their favor(using citations which are from their state's media) and throwing some warnings every now and then.I shall also like to confess that I have been uncivil few times and due to my poor English and my ignorance towards wiki's procedures,i perhaps I broke few rules.But now I have fully understood the citation language which those understand. I urge u to watch those topics for NPOV in Border dispute section.

About dispute-Indian states of Maharashtra and Karnataka have been fighting for Belgaum and adjoining areas which are currently with Karnataka,but its(Belgaum's) majority of people are Maharashtrians.(which is not agreed by K'taka).Maharashtra state is formed for the Marathi language speakers and hence Belgaum-residents want to join Maharashtra.but K'taka was awarded those regions by an commission during late 50's on the grounds of administrative ease befor the creation of Maharashtra state. The case has been transferred to Supreme court after decades of struggle.I am from Maharashtra and want Karnataka wikipedians to keep NPOV intact.

Thanks, mahawiki 04:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]