User talk:Freedom skies: Difference between revisions
Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:Thanks for the note regarding reintroduction of the template! [[User:Shushruth|Shushruth]] 07:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC) |
:Thanks for the note regarding reintroduction of the template! [[User:Shushruth|Shushruth]] 07:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
==[[Indian martial arts]]== |
|||
Good job on the page. Kennethtennyson vandalized the [[Indian nationalism]] page, and its good you engage him in a real debate.[[User:Bakasuprman|Bakaman]] <font color = "blue"><sub>[[User talk:Bakasuprman|Bakatalk]]</sub></font> 01:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:24, 1 September 2006
warning
look, this is a warning... your article is obviously disputed. you can keep the article if you wish as is, but because it is disputed, please leave the NPOV and the Disputed titles at the top. This is a warning and there is a policy against multiple reverts. Steelhead 23:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
3rr
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Cowman109Talk 01:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Do not delete content from talks
Per above. This is against policy. :: Colin Keigher 
09:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- User CiteCop has been deleting well-known points in the Indian Nationalism article saying that they are "not referenced". I'm looking for citations to please him, but maybe he'll still delete stuff. Please lend a hand if you can spare the time. Thanks.Netaji 02:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Removal of Ref needed from Indian History
Hi!! I noticed that you have removed the unreferenced template from the said article. However, you have not given a reason in either your edit summary or in the talk page. The article still contains many unreferenced statements. Until we reference them and organize it better, it will not become encyclopedic in nature. I was hoping that one day it might be a featured article as it has a lot of data in it - but it needs a lot of referencing and reorganizing to reach that level. Should we put the tag back on so that people who look into referencing can find this article and improve it ? Cheers and happy editing Shushruth 16:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note regarding reintroduction of the template! Shushruth 07:01, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Good job on the page. Kennethtennyson vandalized the Indian nationalism page, and its good you engage him in a real debate.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)