User talk:Willard84: Difference between revisions
2a02:c7d:14fc:c600:ac06:c66e:8988:269 (talk) |
→Chabahar vs Gwadar: new section |
||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
== Chabahar port unnecessary information on CPEC article == |
== Chabahar port unnecessary information on CPEC article == |
||
I understand this port was created in response to CPEC but you added way too much information to an article which has nothing to do with India or Iran. If you want to add it cut it down and keep it snappy instead of painting it as some grand scheme which India has mastered. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269|2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269|talk]]) 09:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
I understand this port was created in response to CPEC but you added way too much information to an article which has nothing to do with India or Iran. If you want to add it cut it down and keep it snappy instead of painting it as some grand scheme which India has mastered. [[Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269|2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269]] ([[User talk:2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269|talk]]) 09:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Chabahar vs Gwadar == |
|||
Hi Willard84, I would advise against trying to set up a contest between Chabahar and Gwadar. It will just inflame the nationalists on both sides. Further, materially, the needs of China and India in engaging in these projects are quite different. If we make any comparisons, we should only do so on the basis of impeccable scholarly sources, not nationalistic news commentators. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 11:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:30, 24 May 2016
Welcome
|
- Noted
Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. When you recently edited Balawaristan National Front, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PPP, PML and Kohistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Pakistan
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from Pakistan WikiProject. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
- You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
- Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
- Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
- Add your name in the members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: {{User WikiProject Pakistan}}
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around! Mar4d (talk) 07:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.
Join us:
- Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
- Page: Pakistani Wikipedians
And then sign my guestbook for memories.
Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 08:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Michigan Wikipedians
Greetings Willard84! I noticed that you made mention of the University of Michigan or Ann Arbor on your userpage. If you are a current student, faculty, or other affiliate at the University of Michigan, I would like to welcome you, on behalf of the Michigan Wikipedians, to our next weekly meeting on Monday September 30 (and every Monday thereafter). The meetings are held at 8:00 PM (EDT) in the University of Michigan Shapiro Library, room 4041. New and experienced editors alike are most welcome. Do not hesitate to leave me a message if you have any questions, and feel free to stop by the MWiki talk page. The Michigan Wikipedians are excited to meet you! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Content replaced at Hindu Temple of The Woodlands
Hi! I took a look at Hindu Temple of The Woodlands and totally replaced the content.
I read the links and they did not support what you wrote that they said.
- In this revision:
- Your text: "which is vocal in its support of Hindu Nationalist politicians such as Narendra Modi," - Sourced to this page which does not say Narendra Modi, nor does it specify "The Woodlands" temple in any place.
Please make sure that the sources you cite actually reflect what you write. Thanks! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
Hi Willard84!
Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.
Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.
Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan
Hi Willard84!
Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.
You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan
December-2014
Please stop adding unsourced opinions and unreliable sources as you did to Caste system among Muslims. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Also stop using multiple IPs or accounts if you are doing that. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- I see you are also fabricating references now. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Point out the fabricated resource. Your only defense to long typed up researched article was "nonsense"
And yes, that was my IP, I forgot to log in. Ooops.
December -2014
You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Nar Sher Ali Khan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Firstly, What I said makes sense. If you need me to simplify my English, I would be more than happy to oblige. Secondly, the page you provided neither proves nor disproves any point you made, and so is completely irrelevant.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Willard84 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- You are promoting the term Azad Kashmir and yet you are inserting a category that is about Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and it doesn't even exists. That's why your changes are nonsensical, include this too.[1] I am surprised that you are still talking about it. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:01, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Economy of Pakistan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨) |
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Editing While Logged Out
It has been found that you have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use an account and an IP on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed.
This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Mike V • Talk 21:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peshawar Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalash. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Saleh Mohammad Street
Hello Willard84,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saleh Mohammad Street for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pjposullivan (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daryalal Street, Karachi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sindhi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Laxmi Das Street
The article Laxmi Das Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable street
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ram Bharti Street, Karachi
The article Ram Bharti Street, Karachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable street, doesn't give any indication of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
for Paki related articles Saadkhan12345 (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of Chandan Mukhi Lane
The article Chandan Mukhi Lane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 20:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 17 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Sahiwal Coal Power Project page, your edit caused a redundant parameter error (help) and an archiveurl error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Thar Engro Coal Power Project, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Thar Power Plant. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Thar Power Plant into Thar Engro Coal Power Project. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chaghla Street
The article Chaghla Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG. Appears to be just another street. How far do we drill down on the basis of "all places are inherently notable"?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lakshmi Building
The article Lakshmi Building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:37, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
CPEC
Thank you for helping with the edits. I am sorry that you have been harassed by another editor. I have told him to stop blaming you on his talk page. If you want any help looking for sources feel free to ping me anytime u like. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 10:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Chabahar port unnecessary information on CPEC article
I understand this port was created in response to CPEC but you added way too much information to an article which has nothing to do with India or Iran. If you want to add it cut it down and keep it snappy instead of painting it as some grand scheme which India has mastered. 2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:AC06:C66E:8988:269 (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Chabahar vs Gwadar
Hi Willard84, I would advise against trying to set up a contest between Chabahar and Gwadar. It will just inflame the nationalists on both sides. Further, materially, the needs of China and India in engaging in these projects are quite different. If we make any comparisons, we should only do so on the basis of impeccable scholarly sources, not nationalistic news commentators. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)