Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cirt (talk | contribs)
OneClickArchiver archived List of courthouse buildings in the United States: A nominated for deletion to [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States/Archive 11#List of courthouse buildings in the Unit...
Cirt (talk | contribs)
Line 112: Line 112:


If you take a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=He+promised+the+use+of+torture+would+cease+at+the+camp.+He+promised+to+institute+a+new+review+system.+That+new+review+system+was+composed+of+officials+from+six+departments%2C+where+the+OARDEC+reviews+were+conducted+entirely+by+the+Department+of+Defense.&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=eoh1w72ijdohew3cglwf13p6e this search], you'll notice that the foregoing text is repeated, exactly as it is, across dozens of articles. I don't know if this is an issue, but I thought I should say something because I kept stumbling on the same text over and over. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 20:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
If you take a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=He+promised+the+use+of+torture+would+cease+at+the+camp.+He+promised+to+institute+a+new+review+system.+That+new+review+system+was+composed+of+officials+from+six+departments%2C+where+the+OARDEC+reviews+were+conducted+entirely+by+the+Department+of+Defense.&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=eoh1w72ijdohew3cglwf13p6e this search], you'll notice that the foregoing text is repeated, exactly as it is, across dozens of articles. I don't know if this is an issue, but I thought I should say something because I kept stumbling on the same text over and over. [[User:Mz7|Mz7]] ([[User talk:Mz7|talk]]) 20:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

== The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review ==

I've listed ''[[The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise]]'' for [[WP:PR|peer review]].

Comments would be appreciated, at [[Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1]].

Thank you for your time,

— '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 10 April 2016

Main pageTalkEmbassyRequested
Articles
MembersPortalRecognized
content
To doHelp

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

    Welcome to the discussion page of WikiProject United States

    Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...

    The Wikipedia Library

    There are up to 30 free one-year Alexander Street Press (ASP) accounts available to experienced Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP.

    Alexander Street Press is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online: Premium collection" includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (like 60 minutes) and newsreels, music and theatre, speeches and lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. This collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, engineering, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 22:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    A previous revision (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_cities_in_Indiana&oldid=712185151) of the article List of cities in Indiana has had a somewhat green background color for some entries in the table. I assume they've been used to refer to "second-class" cities. Can someone clarify on what they're used for? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! --Rollingcontributor (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Art

    I am an artist. I paint in oil. I mostly paint tropical paintings. I would like some help to properly post my art, myself and about how I learned to paint on Wiki. Could someone who knows how, please help me out? You can also find the Highwaymen artists on Wiki. I worked and painted with highwaymen R.L. Lewis Jr. They have a very interesting story. Thank you, Artist Bonnie Butler — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArtistBonnieButler (talk • contribs) 18:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    RfC

    Hello there! There's an ongoing RfC concerning Paul Singer and WP:NPOV in a broader sense, that you might care to comment on. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court

    New category, Category:Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court, please help populate with historical cases.

    Thank you,

    Cirt (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    We'll probably have a bunch more in the coming months. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with above prophecy by Muboshgu (talk · contribs). — Cirt (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

    Hello,
    Please note that Pecan pie, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
    Delivered by MusikBot talk 00:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team[reply]

    The same text is duplicated across a lot of articles

    Not sure if this is the right place to bring this up or even if this is problematic, but while disambiguating Freedom of Information Act, I noticed that an unusually high number of articles regarding prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp are presenting the exact same content, namely:

    When he assumed office in January 2009 President Barack Obama made a number of promises about the future of Guantanamo.[1][2][3] He promised the use of torture would cease at the camp. He promised to institute a new review system. That new review system was composed of officials from six departments, where the OARDEC reviews were conducted entirely by the Department of Defense. When it reported back, a year later, the Joint Review Task Force classified some individuals as too dangerous to be transferred from Guantanamo, even though there was no evidence to justify laying charges against them. On April 9, 2013, that document was made public after a Freedom of Information Act request.[4]

    References

    1. ^ Peter Finn (January 22, 2010). "Justice task force recommends about 50 Guantanamo detainees be held indefinitely". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19. Retrieved July 21, 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
    2. ^ Peter Finn (May 29, 2010). "Most Guantanamo detainees low-level fighters, task force report says". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19. Retrieved July 21, 2010. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
    3. ^ Andy Worthington (June 11, 2010). "Does Obama Really Know or Care About Who Is at Guantánamo?". Archived from the original on 2010-06-16. Retrieved July 21, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
    4. ^ "71 Guantanamo Detainees Determined Eligible to Receive a Periodic Review Board as of April 19, 2013". Joint Review Task Force. 2013-04-09. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19. Retrieved 2015-05-18. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

    If you take a look at this search, you'll notice that the foregoing text is repeated, exactly as it is, across dozens of articles. I don't know if this is an issue, but I thought I should say something because I kept stumbling on the same text over and over. Mz7 (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review

    I've listed The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise for peer review.

    Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise/archive1.

    Thank you for your time,

    Cirt (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]