Talk:The Life of Pablo: Difference between revisions
Another Believer (talk | contribs) reflist |
EvergreenFir (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
== 84/100 == |
== 84/100 == |
||
According to the Metacritic website, The Life of Pablo has an above average score of an 84/100, based on 12 reviews. http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west<ref>{{cite web|last1=Handley|first1=Aaron|title=Reviews for The Life of Pablo by Kanye West - Metacritic|url=http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west|website=Metacritic|publisher=Metacritic|accessdate=17 February 2016|ref=Metacritic}}</ref> |
According to the Metacritic website, The Life of Pablo has an above average score of an 84/100, based on 12 reviews. http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west<ref>{{cite web|last1=Handley|first1=Aaron|title=Reviews for The Life of Pablo by Kanye West - Metacritic|url=http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west|website=Metacritic|publisher=Metacritic|accessdate=17 February 2016|ref=Metacritic}}</ref> {{unsigned|2broke}} |
||
:Down to 82 now. [[User:EvergreenFir|'''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''']] [[User talk:EvergreenFir|(talk)]] <small>Please {{[[Template:re|re]]}}</small> 21:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
{{reflist-talk}} |
{{reflist-talk}} |
Revision as of 21:27, 17 February 2016
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Draft / history merge
May be worth merging Draft:Swish (album). ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
"All Day"
This article contains details about the song "All Day", which does not appear on the album. Should all content about this song be removed? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- It was released in promotion for the album, so I vote no.1Sire (talk) 01:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2016
Add label info Good Music, Roc-A-Fella, & Def Jam Those are the releasing labels. Roc-A-Fella is added to keep the branding alive so copyright office doesn't revoke the license to use the name. Example, JAY Z's MCHG had a Roc-A-Fella Logo but it was released by Roc Nation and Universal. You can research on the Def Jam Website, hit releases and then hit Roc-A-Fella. Most of Kanye's Releases are there currently. Thank You. Defjamad661 (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --allthefoxes (Talk) 16:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
ADDED: SOURCE(DefJam.com/Releases) then hit Roc-A-Fella, then you would see kanyes latest releases released under that label
Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2016
Kanye changed the first track on WAVES from "Nina Chop" to "Famous"[1] NicGastellu (talk) 15:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- The article has been updated accordingly. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
References
WAVES tracklist was released in 2016, not 2015
Just needs a date correction. 2601:85:4501:B2C8:5455:2077:3EF0:B184 (talk) 17:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)2/10/2016, JU
Producer on Fade
Ryan Vojtesak (aka Charlie Handsome) produced on Fade...his name should be added in the credits section for that record
- Done This appears to be resolved. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
DJ Dodger Stadium (Jerome Potter) should be credited for production too, as well as production on Feedback 4, Low Lights, Ultralight Beam and Father Stretch My Hands Pt 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.74.53 (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Re: Martin Shrekli
I don't know where to put this so sorry, but the album is dropping today https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/698175350854021120 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.51.121.111 (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
---Another Believer (Talk) 15:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The only source for Shrkeli being able to hold up production is Shkreli himself. As a legal matter, Shkreli's argument is absurd. Even if Kanye were himself a corporation, corporations are not under any obligation to hold a board vote over any yahoo's offer to purchase an asset they own. That portion in the intro really should be either removed or at least edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.56.22.127 (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Remove that martin skhreli bs
"The Life of Pablo is the seventh studio album by American rapper Kanye West. It will be released by GOOD Music, Roc-A-Fella Records and Def Jam Recordings on February 12, 2016, however this the release is subject to change to Martin Shkreli applied for acquisition of the album and publishing rights for the price of $10 million which will result in him having sole copy of the album and in the application Martin Shkreli has stated not to release the album commercially"
Ugh.... not only is the Martin Skhreli proposal extremely likely to be rejected (you really think Kanye would do that? Since the proposal was created he's said he's still releasing the album), but this is a terribly written sentence. I can't edit this but someone ought to fix this.
The proposal not only isn't likely to be accepted, it doesn't even need to be considered. Shkreli's legal argument is outright absurd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.56.22.127 (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Ultra Light Beams
Earl Sweatshirt co-produced "Ultra Light Beams" as randomblackdude. Rtjfan (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Source? I can see it, the drums are very Earl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.96.66.4 (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Here is a possible source for whoever suggested this: http://goodmusicallday.com/2016/02/kanye-west-life-of-pablo-album-tracklist/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.65.206.188 (talk) 05:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Track 3 is called Pt 2
Not Father Stretch My Hands Pt 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by :206.174.179.44 (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done This appears to be resolved. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2016
169.231.28.100 (talk) 08:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC) This album's genre should also be considered a gospel album. Throughout the album there are many bible references and choir singing and it meets the genre criteria.
- Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article.
Genres are quite contentious, and what editors think the genres are, is just their PoV, and not sufficient for inclusion - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC) - Reliable sources are needed to confirm genres. Marking this section as resolved since the request has been addressed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Last sentence "Release and Promotion"
Would help to clarify that it was released exclusively to stream through Tidal and exclusively to purchase through Kanye's website (www.kanyewest.com). Also may want to consider inputting notes on the rocky rollout and Tidal's intially incorrect track listing re: Fade and Facts. Initially the streaming and downloadable versions of the album had the same file for Facts (Charlie Heat Version) and Fade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maltease (talk • contribs) 10:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Wolves Sampling Nightcall
The howl before the Frank O. section comes from Nightcall by Kavinsky featuring Lovefoxxx from the Drive soundtrack. 64.147.210.162 (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Appears so: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MV_3Dpw-BRY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.65.206.188 (talk) 05:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Uncredited samples
According to this review - http://music.theaureview.com/reviews/kanye-west-the-life-of-pablo-2016-lp/ - the intro for "Ultralight Beam" featured an uncredited sample from a vine. Linked to in the review.[1]
I've added an "unreferenced section" tag to the Tracklisting section, which includes not only the tracklist but a long list of Notes and sample credits. Does the single Tidal inline citation really provide sufficient evidence for these many notes and credits? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Telegraph review is for the songs played at Yeezy season 3, not released album
Just wondering if it is correct to include the Telegraph review by Neil Cormick in the "Critical Reception" since that is not reviewing the released album, but instead the songs played at the Yeezy season 3 event. I know that event was supposed to be an album listening party, but in the end the released album has a lot of changes from the event, including 8 more songs.
The review is from the 12th of February. Seems weird to have that review for an album released the 14th of February. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorwikiroj (talk • contribs) 09:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The Telegraph's review should not be here. The critic could not have even had the full quality files to listen to before writing the "review". It's obvious the review was driven by the 24hour news cycle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WestIRL (talk • contribs) 17:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Reviews
The album did NOT receive "rave reviews". It clearly has gotten mixed reception. Just because you are a fan doesn't mean you have to be biased and overhype it when it hasn't been earned. Majority of reviews released thus far have been mixed. Even the star ratings in the article prove the same. It is such a lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:84:4601:84D1:2C40:B57D:F2CC:62B5 (talk) 23:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Update Metacritic to be be 74/100 out of 6 reviews' Olapecko (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2016
According to Metacritic, The Life of Pablo received an 80/100 from The New York Times; include it in the critical reception of the album.
Source: http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west Slimjosa (talk) 05:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Missing the featurings
All the featurings should be added — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.51.39.165 (talk) 19:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps this is a suggestion to move the featured vocalists in the Notes section to the Track listing section? ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
84/100
According to the Metacritic website, The Life of Pablo has an above average score of an 84/100, based on 12 reviews. http://www.metacritic.com/music/the-life-of-pablo/kanye-west[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2broke (talk • contribs)
- Down to 82 now. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Handley, Aaron. "Reviews for The Life of Pablo by Kanye West - Metacritic". Metacritic. Metacritic. Retrieved 17 February 2016.