Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nikki♥311 04:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the list of match types you have added back in. That list is already located in the article at the end of the "Undertaker Character" section. It doesn't need to be listed twice. I have also removed the part about Mark Henry "believing" that the Undertaker has made more money than The Rock and Hogan. That's just his belief with no solid facts behind it. Thus it has no place in an encyclopedia.

I've also removed this: "Calaway has also competed on 19 different WWE shows, which is more than any other WWE superstar. Also, he has appeared on 61 different PPV posters, the highest of any WWE superstar and 16 different video game covers, second only to Triple H". Just because something is sourced doesn't mean it belongs in an encyclopedia. This information is trivial and more appropriate for some fansite. Nikki♥311 07:49, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, it is best to discuss your edits on the talk page as at least three people have reverted your edits. We might be able to come to some sort of compromise. Also, please be civil instead of calling people names in edit summaries, especially long-tenured and/or well respected editors. Nikki♥311 08:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. People add things to pages everyday, and it is impossible to police them all. The existence of something on one page isn't a good argument for having it in another page. In this case, though, Jim Ross was an executive with the company which makes his opinion on the money generated more notable. Mark Henry is just Undertaker's co-worker. Also, please sign your posts by typing ~~~~ at the end. Nikki♥311 21:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at The Undertaker. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CrashUnderride 14:53, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]