Hi, I have updated some information on Andhra Pradesh and East Godavari district pages, regarding the merged mandals. It is suprising that the edit has been reverted without any proper reason. I am from East Godavari district and I have detailed information of the 4 merged mandals with valid references. I am not that much active in wikipedia and I wish that you would update the information with due concern. Totally 7 mandals have been transfered from Telangana to Andhra Pradesh. They are, 4 mandals from Bhadrachalam division are Chinturu, Kunavaram, Vararamachandrapuram, Bhadrachalam (excluding the Bhadrachalam revenue village). 3 mandals from Palvancha division are Kukunoor, Velerupadu, Burgampadu (except 12 villages namely, pinapaka, morampalli, banjara, burgampadu, naginiprolu, krishnasagar, tekula, sarapaka, iravendi, motepattinagar, uppusaka, nakiripeta and sompalli). You can refer in Indian Gazette, http://www.indiacode.nic.in/acts2014/19_of_2014.pdf. Bsskchaitanya (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok fine, I'll check it. Good work.--Vin09 (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi vin09, I had created a page "Sri PENUSILA Narasimha Wildlife"Sanctuary". Someone has moved to "Sri PENINSULA Narasimha Wildlife".Sanctuary". Is is penusila but it changed to peninsula. for reference "ref:: http://www.penchalakona.com/history.html" please revert the change, as i am not an autoconfirmed user to make change.

Hello what's the problem problem... I wrote and updated is official by Indian government. I Do not what is the mistake and problem in updating the current info. If you want to increase your edits.this is not the way Ramtejvarma (talk) 12:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ramtejvarma: You read WP:UNREFERENCED. Also, do not add wiki link for the page itself.--Vin09 (talk) 10:40, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vin09 don't delete any contents or articles without proper discussion, if you have any proof of wrong data please talk to particular user and on confirmation do the changes, this about Ganikapudi article. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandrasekhar.kakarla (talk • contribs) 19:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at Ganikapudi where it shows your addition of WP:OR and removal of referenced content. What should I discuss about WP:OR? It ws mentioned 1752 as population, from where it was? As per WP:Gallery should not add galleries to articles. Also, please sign your comments when you write something.--Vin09 (talk) 04:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

don't know from where you are updating WIKI details, What should I discuss about WP:OR? it was mentioned 1752 as population, which is reference from 2011 Census of India I don't know from where you got 5,615. I don't know how it's possible to keep that count. for School details AP Govt Website for School Report, and icbsc website please check once, As a native person of Ganikapudi. I am the authorized person to update details. I don't know without any reference you are updating wiki. Please check yourself once. ( Chandra 17:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC) )

It was not 5615, that was mistaken, check infobox, I've corrected. That was not original research, but the references were not mistaken, only the thing is info box detail was not mentioned in the section. Also, please sign your posts.--Vin09 (talk) 17:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Chandrasekhar.kakarla: I am the authorized person to update details. what were you authorized, any user in wiki can update any page, wiki doesn't grant any authorization for a native, only if you can provide reference, you are free to edit. Do not give false warnings, as I've not added any original research. Whereas, your edit at this has original research. If you can still add with proper reference, you can. But do not say that you were authorized for a page. Also, please read WP:Gallery.--Vin09 (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vin09: Please give me details why content is removed from the Ganikapudi article (other than gallery). Please discuss before any changes please give some respect to the other contributors. As a experienced contributor should know this. After changes I informed to you regarding this. Please discuss before doing any changes. (Chandra 18:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC))[reply]

@Chandrasekhar.kakarla:I never disrespect any user, I'm here to help other editors. I've clearly mentioned the reasons, an original research is not accepted by wiki as you wrote Perfumes Hub did you provide reference for it? read MOS:FLAG to not to add flags, the population which you gave didn't provide reference again, provided school details library and books in them, wiki is not a WP:NOTDIR. I think you may be clear now. If you still feel anything wrong reply back.--Vin09 (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vin09: If you are really helping other editors you should discuss in this situation. and it didn't happened last time and you removed complete content which edited by many people from last 5 years. And you added warning message in my talk page as non original research. coming to the point Perfumes Hub is not my edit. it's edited long back. And even that is correct nearly 40% people are Muslims and they used to sell perfumes by travelling to different villages and cities and near by villagers and spokespersons call it as Perfumes Hub. If you need more details please contact any villagers who are near by or same village and you will get details. I given reference in previous talk, I don't know if reference is not there that will become false?. If you find school details has library and books and it's not necessary to place please update the details but removing completely is not a good practice. even for galley if you feel placing gallery is not a standard you should be updated with one or two relevant images in article and helped article to improve. I think you got it now. If you still need any details reply back. Chandra 18:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Even after mentioning some wiki rules, you are not reading them, I request you to go through once again WP:OR, WP:Reliable Sources. I do not require any contact details, if other editors reads that page, how do they know, people do not require what happens in that Village, wiki needs reliable sources. I do respect your view of discussing issues but you need to go through those pages and read them thoroughly, I once again advice you to read those policies. Hope we can move to our work now.--Vin09 (talk) 02:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vin09: Yes that is what I am trying to say @Vin09, Please refer to the wiki rules. I don't know any rules which will allow editors to remove complete content without proper discussion (Basic Rule). I request you to go through once again Editing_and_discussion, Wikipedia:Deletion_and_deletionism#Step_One:_Verify_if_the_article_in_question_can_be_improved_rather_than_be_deleted, Wikipedia:Editing_policy,Wikipedia:Common_knowledge#Should_I_believe_what_other_editors_say.3F, Wikipedia:Etiquette and Civility. I do respect your contribution but don't delete contents without validating and discussing. Yes there is no information related to what happens in that village, it's only history and statistics of the village. Hope you try to verify if article can be improved rather than be deleted. Chandra 06:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

@Chandrasekhar.kakarla:So read yourself which mentioned by you, article should not be deleted, I did same I've not deleted article. I've removed content and improved by providing reference. Can even read Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle.--Vin09 (talk) 07:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vin09: I'll stop my conversation here. I hope you will help wiki to improve instead of simply removing contents. Chandra 07:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]