Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:75.34.103.158: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Isinbill (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
NeilN (talk | contribs)
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)
Line 7: Line 7:
==Uganda Martyrs==
==Uganda Martyrs==
Youre edits to this article are starting to become disruptive. Particularly when you start deleting comments I have made from the article talk page. [[User:Contaldo80|Contaldo80]] ([[User talk:Contaldo80|talk]]) 09:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Youre edits to this article are starting to become disruptive. Particularly when you start deleting comments I have made from the article talk page. [[User:Contaldo80|Contaldo80]] ([[User talk:Contaldo80|talk]]) 09:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

== October 2015 ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 01:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 01:10, 31 October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia! Everybody is welcome to collaborate. However, your editions in the Ugandan American article had to be reverted because to a vandalism act you did: You should not remove the "tag" "ref name = "American Survey" no reason. This element in the references is important for I can reference several data in different part of article without repeating the entire reference. With this repeated element several times, I can go to the same reference in all phrases related. So, there would be not several identical references, but only one.--Isinbill (talk) 03:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Adding fraudulent material to an article, as you are at Luganda, is vandalism and may result in you being WP:BLOCKED. You need sources for your claims. Read WP:RS. — kwami (talk) 04:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uganda Martyrs

Youre edits to this article are starting to become disruptive. Particularly when you start deleting comments I have made from the article talk page. Contaldo80 (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 01:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.