Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User:Huldra/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Zero0000 (talk | contribs)
Autopatrolled, Administrators
42,996 edits
Line 38: Line 38:


===Automatic CU of all "new" editors on ARBPIA?===
===Automatic CU of all "new" editors on ARBPIA?===

I don't think this is workable; the CUsers would go on strike due to the workload. However, I propose a weaker version: it should be that a valid reason for requesting CU that a new user appears already familiar with Wikipedia editing. The CUser can decide whether the evidence provided for "already familiar with Wikipedia editing" is adequate. [[User:Zero0000|Zero]]<sup><small>[[User_talk:Zero0000|talk]]</small></sup> 12:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


===NPoV enforcement===
===NPoV enforcement===

Revision as of 12:14, 31 August 2015

Recruitment

AfD

Socks

NoCal and Lutrinae:

Other

  • Interiew
    • Mehdi Hasan: There’s also the issue, of course, of really, really contentious issues that people feel strongly about on lots of different sides. A few years ago, I believe, an Israeli lobbying group was accused of encouraging its members to become Wikipedia editors so that they could control the narrative on the Israeli conflict. How, then, can I take any pages on Wikipedia seriously about Israel-Palestine?
    • Jimmy Wales: There's one model people have of how Wikipedia should work, which is a battleground. So the battleground is: Wikipedia will get to neutrality because people from different sides will fight it out until they somehow have to come to a compromise. We reject that approach. That approach is not healthy. That approach just leads to endless conflict. Instead what we like to say is, “Look, Wikipedia - every Wikipedia editor has a responsibility to try to be neutral. To try to take into account different perspectives on an issue, and if there is no one…” (source: [1])

Remedies?

500 edit limit for new users?

Semi-protect all ARBPIA ?

Automatic CU of all editors blocked as socks?

Automatic CU of all "new" editors on ARBPIA?

I don't think this is workable; the CUsers would go on strike due to the workload. However, I propose a weaker version: it should be that a valid reason for requesting CU that a new user appears already familiar with Wikipedia editing. The CUser can decide whether the evidence provided for "already familiar with Wikipedia editing" is adequate. Zerotalk 12:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

NPoV enforcement

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3ADiff%2F678752917