This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. African diaspora Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Electronic music Start‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Music/Music genres task force Start‑class Grime music is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. London Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Voting for fusing Electro-grime and Rhythm & grime to Grime

Both Electro-grime and Rhythm & grime have too little content, and (arguably) won't be expanded in a long time. I vote for fusing them in Grime as sub-sections. If we ever need to split the page, it can be done at a later time (via the "main article" template, maybe). -ArkBlitz (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't really vote on Wikipedia, changes are carried out by consensus. I agree that the above articles should be merged here, given they seem unlikely to be expanded for now. They can always be moved back if they care sufficiently expanded.--SabreBD (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Electro article now redirects here. I removed the merge tags from the article because they have been there since 11/08 without any decision. If you want to merge the other one I think you go ahead and do the merge without fear of any strong objection. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:16, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and redirected rhythm and grime here too, you can pull any content worth merging from it's history. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He isn't a pioneer of any genre, and most defiantly not a grime MC. anyone that adds it should be forced to have ginger children like him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.210.134.184 (talk) 14:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--82.139.5.13 (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zoele (talk) 01:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no, it isn't. Kaini (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So they called it Krunk. It is highly similar. Some of it is the same. Guess what that means? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoele (talk • contribs) 22:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The whole article reads like an american magazine article on Grime. This really needs changing, there is not even a mention of the butterz label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.3.171 (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The lede is just too excessive. All that is necessary are a few examples of each category - pioneers, notables etc. It's not necessary to list all that any given editor either is aware or a fan of. As I stated earlier, there's something wrong when there are more wikilinks in a lede section than non-wikilinked words.

Please discuss why every single one of those links is necessary to be in the lede, and indeed needs linking at all. Show why they are notable using sources, and remember that just because an artist has a wiki article may make them notable for mention in the article - but not necessarily notable for the lede section. By all means if they can be found homes in the article itself put them in - but again - why is the lede being crammed full?

It looks bad, and seems counter-intuitive - generally pioneers are few and far between, yet the article suggests that there are many of them, which dilutes the term "pioneer", whcih is essentially an innovator. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please join a discussion here as to why the lede for this article needs to be crammed with so many artists. The point of the lede is to summarise the article, which means a brief explanation of what follows - and is not an escuxe to list so many artists, especially when it's debateable that they are notable or pioneers - certainly to the level of a mention in the lede. Notability is not defined simply as having a wiki article, but also measured by mainstream success and reliable sources reporting on them.

Please comment here before readding lists - or at the very least use edit summaries to explain your thinking. Thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grime (music) → Grime music – Standard title form, in line for example with the FA heavy metal music. --Relisted.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC) --MASHAUNIX 00:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Article title should just be Grime per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -Neodop (talk) 18:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That might indeed be an even better idea.--MASHAUNIX 10:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have no opinion over a change from "Grime (music)" to "Grime music", but would be opposed to just plain "Grime", as I'm not convinced it is indeed a primary topic, and think that the disambig should be retained. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. I'm fine with either version ("grime music" or "grime" as primary topic).--MASHAUNIX 14:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]