If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Mabdul}} on your talk. If you want to ask me here why your AfC submission was declined, please go to our Help Desk or the Teahouse instead!

Archives

October 2008 - February 2010 March 2010 - July 2010 July 2010 - March 2011 End March 2011 - End July 2011 August 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - April 2012 (failed RfA) April 2012 - July 2012 July 2012 - October 2012 October 2012 - /barnstars

Please advise in detail I do to understand the flaw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.86.0 (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry? I don't understand. Can you explain the situtaion a bit more? mabdul 14:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Can you tell me, why you removed my addition of parm on the comparision of project management software page?

Br Thomas ThomasRJaeger

Hi ThomasRJaeger,

did you read the "edit notice" above the edit text field? Every software that does not have it's own article at Wikipedia get instantly removed from that list. Please read also WP:WTAF. mabdul 14:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

we no longer have that title — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.218.52 (talk) 21:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, I don't understand. Can you explain your request more clearly? Which page are you talking about? mabdul 16:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

check it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Petrb/Weird_pages and confirm I can run it over this list Petrb (talk) 15:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what's this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/2006-12-25 Petrb (talk) 15:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Technical Barnstar
	For your work on the AfC helper script! APerson (talk!) 13:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Inactive account creators. Thank you. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 07:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 03:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:29, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cllr. Rabia Bhatti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Roohi Singh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Torben Bakager Larsen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Cllr. Rabia Bhatti.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cllr. Rabia Bhatti}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. mabdul 05:38, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UnitedBankofIndiaLogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)#A proposed tool for reducing backlogs. APerson (talk!) 17:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Resolved

Come see us on IRC and

Hello, Mabdul. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@Technical 13: WP:DEADLINE. There's no hurry. Real life isn't always the most glamorous thing in the world, but we all have to do it (sometimes) ;) Theopolisme (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As said by mail: it seems that I don't have any "special" permission, too. mabdul 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that Nathan2055 gave it to you. :/ Theopolisme (talk) 15:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

me too... mabdul 05:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't suppose you could email him mabdul? I left a note on his talk page, but he doesn't have email enabled and i don't seem to have his email address. I'd hate to have to create a new project and move everything over so that we can properly manage it. But, it might be an option that we will be forced to consider if we can't get a hold of him. Technical 13 (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what's the issue here? --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 14:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mabdul: It looks like the submitter of the above article took your advice, but then didn't resubmit for one reason or another. What do you think of the article now? —Anne Delong (talk) 18:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have resubmitted it simply. I haven't the time to review articles. mabdul 10:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should I not have deleted that? Was I too hasty?

By the way: Hi! Long time!!!! :) :) :) How's things? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I'm not sure if I thanked you for your support at my RfA. If I forgot: Thank you!!!! (I'm increasingly forgetful, and can't even remember having put the kettle on half the time.) :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anna,

looking at WP:NSONG, I believe it shouldn't have been deleted:

The following factors suggest that a song or single may be notable, though a standalone article should still satisfy the aforementioned criteria.

1. Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts.

Regards, mabdul 10:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just restored it. I hope you can accept my humblest apologies as I was acting in good faith. I thought all of those criteria should be met.

Please see: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Trouble (Neon Jungle song)

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore the talk page, too. mabdul 10:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry again. I think that was my first incorrect delete, so I didn't know that the talk page didn't undelete automatically. Sorry for all the trouble. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Everybody has to learn how to deal with the tools. Actually I could improve experience at test.wikipedia.org as I'm doing there my AFCH tests. (although I'm not an admin at enwp) mabdul 10:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you deleted and declined or refused to publish the article on Breakdown of Sanity? there is loads of link and sources for the article yet it isn't published? i tried to start my own article about them without noticing there is already one but it has not been published. is there a reason for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremevic (talk • contribs) 03:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Mabdul, thanks for your recent assistance cleaning up my I AM THE BEST ARTIST Rene revision; long-time-no-see! I've just gone public with the related new article René Moncada and I'd like to ask for your help: I will next submit it to DYK, and knowing what I went through for the initial IATBA article I may need some support backing the nomination! At your convenience please do check it out and help keep an eye on it? Thanks friend! Penwatchdog (talk) 14:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Penwatchdog,

OK, I already fixed the references and some other small stuff using some scripts. Maybe I find some time today to READ the article, I'm rather busy this and the next weeks. Most visible stuff is already fixed, so create a nomination page and transclude it on the DYK/nom page. We will have enough time to fix other issues then. mabdul 07:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

added headline mabdul 12:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My sister is being diagnosed with Acute Transversematis, she is always put on to assistance tube to be able to urinate, sometimes sha has difficulty in breathing and subjected to oxygen currently in Loispaeture Private Hospital, South Africa. Please help.

Monica Ngomane — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.78.32.32 (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sry, but I'm not a doctor and I can't help you. You really should ask her doctors.

Moreover Wikipedia is the wrong channel to get help, see Wikipedia:Medical disclaimer. mabdul 12:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul, please see my responses over here, and correct any goofs or mischaracterizations I may have caused. Thanks. User_talk:West.andrew.g#User_permissions

p.s. Actually, I'm assuming you are interested in this discussion about securing the AfC gadget, since you're one of the main gadget-hackers at the moment. If that's an incorrect assumption, my apologies, please just ping me back that you are not interested. Appreciate it. Thanks for improving wikipedia. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 74.

Actually the the whole script is a "simple" JavaScript and doesn't check for any userrights. (ping @Theopolisme)

"We" (the AFCH developers) actually can't prevent any users for not editing the user by hand (or using an adaption of our own script or more simple at the moemnt: even use our script) and go through the submissions and do whatever he/she wants to do. This has to be done either by a edit filter or by a PHP module which will get loaded. Our proposal a few years ago were turned down by the WMF to implement a userright and that all new articles have to go through AFC. (So deprecating NPP)

I doubt that (whatever you planing to do) it won't succeed as the WMF has some "long term plan" with something called "work flow" (search at meta or mw.org).

Regards, mabdul 23:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • @User:Bender235 STOP CHANGING LINKS or get a BFRA for not spamming my watchlist. mabdul 20:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Because your personal comfort of reading your watchlist (for a day or two!) is more important than readers' privacy? --bender235 (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Bot policy

Note that high-speed semi-automated processes may effectively be considered bots in some cases, even if performed by an account used by a human editor. If in doubt, check.

It is not all about my fun. Simply stopp it that way. mabdul 06:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mabdul. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 05:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:57, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benoit Michel, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Latest stable software release/ZipTorrent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Götz (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mabdul. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Benoit Michel".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benoit Michel}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Torai lies here[1] --- he works for IBM in Ireland. This is why hae has done all the edits to Openoffice.95.172.31.34 (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...I thought that name looked familiar. Well, they can't stop us, 'cause no matter what, WE WILL ASSIMILATE THEM INTO MISSING WIKIPE-

--sorry, yeah, we can fix that. I'll put a notice to his talk page advising against future additions. If the notice that someone doesn't want to be added isn't recent it more than likely won't be seen, so I didn't see it looking through their contributions history.

My bad. Thanks for picking up on it though!

LazyBastardGuy 15:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:29, Wednesday, March 12, 2025 (UTC)

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:29, Wednesday, March 12, 2025 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SAMI  ^talk 12:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created {{Wikipedia:HighBeam/Topicon}}. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 23:58, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Technical 13,

sry, no. I had access I believe, this was long ago. Maybe I would still have, but I can't remember my login.

mabdul 00:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am inviting you to leave me some feedback, 18 months after you opposed my RfA. Do you still believe I am not fit to be an admin? Do you believe I have been able to improve past the concerns you have brought up? Do not be afraid of being too harsh, I am specifically welcoming criticism as I believe it is the best way to improve and I am always looking to learn from my mistakes. I am particularly looking for feedback as to whether you have objections to myself lifting the self-imposed 1RR restriction I had agreed to towards the end of my RfA. If you don't have time to comment, don't fret it either, this is nothing I'll lose sleep over. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mabdul, I see that you have been a contributor to WikiProject Citizendium Porting. I am inclined to mark it as defunct, as there has been no work on it in a couple of years and it seems unlikely that Citizendium will be a useful source of content for Wikipedia articles in the future. Is that o.k. with you? RockMagnetist (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RockMagnetist,

Yeah, I'm totally ok with that. I had realized that most articles and drafts are no way better than the Wikipedian ones except some in the technical (computer) area.

mabdul 19:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]