Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hi Katieh, I'm writing to suggest that the editing of my page Claudia Keelan is not a conflict of interest, and the deletion of the new entry isn't appropriate, as the page is years out of date and does not show the current state of the author's career. I wonder if you could send me my edits, and suggest what in the entry is inappropriate for Wikipedia's guidelines. I understand that the link to the video from The Berlin Poetry festival which was posted on Youtube, may demonstrate a copyright problem with Wikipedia, though all rights reverted to me upon filming. I'd really appreciate your help in making an entry that will not violate any of Wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks for all you do!

Sincerely Yours, --Claudia.keelan (talk) 05:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unresolved

 – Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 18:42, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am totally new to this. I saw your name at the bottom of a 'speedy deletion' of a U-20 Soccer team article I created.

2 reasons stated:

a. ambiguous promotion b. not relevant or something

Maybe it did have ambiguous promotion, whatever that is. But, it is totally relevant. There are like 30 teams in this same national league and they have articles. Why do they not cease to exist?

Please explain. How can people start and learn if they get crushed with no recourse or discussion?

If you can't help me, please refer me to someone who can.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexicomountie (talk • contribs) 01:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Katieh5584: After you welcome somebody, put it on your watchlist for a few days. The article in question is APPA Aguilas.

@Mexicomountie: I'm going to reply here.

Why do they not cease to exist?

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Basically, the other stuff just wasn't checked.

How can people start and learn if they get crushed with no recourse or discussion?

You had two options. One was to contest the deletion on the talk page (it looks like you did, but didn't make a strong argument); the other was to use your sandbox to create a draft. Although it's still possible for it to be deleted, it will give you a chance to work on it first.

And yes. WP:ADVERTISING is deleted at all times. Only an administrator (such as JamesBWatson, not Katieh or me) can see deleted history.

I can't tell if it was spam or not. I see you've already brought this to JamesBWatson's page, wait for their reply.

This was not personal, and not intended to make you feel bad. It's routine cleanup protocol.

Wrong venue. Please move to the talk page of JamesBWatson

 – Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 02:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 02:49, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the evils of this world; of those not directly pertaining to my God's word, I am powerless to challenge but, regarding slandering the Buddhist texts and making, by most standards,many unreasonable edits (cutting quotes from Max Muller, Alexander Hamilton[cousin of the prez], Thomas Paine, Edward Pococke & etc), I have proclaimed myself absolute sovereign over matters such as these and will act accordingly. My man, sometimes it is the case were an average run of the mill person profanely treats the profound and, if there not be a wise person to warn them of such actions, they will fall victim to their own ignorance. I understand how this is offensive to you but I doubt that you are totally informed about the said devils crimes. Whatever the case, you must do what you think is proper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.66.26 (talk) 23:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Katieh5584: No reply necessary for this: baseless personal attack. Generally, archival is preferred, but if this is upsetting you I wouldn't blame you for just blanking it. Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 02:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was a joke because they fingered a girl in a club together (at the same time) :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.227.175 (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) My heart says yes but my head says no.

I get the joke, but some people might not find it funny. Please don't do it again :) Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 02:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 23rd, 2014 Hi Katie,

I did mean to delete the whole thing, I actually work for Tony Penikett, and I was struggling to change a picture without it being taken off; he also felt that some of the information is skewed and would have rather me "delete" the whole thing.

If you could help me with making the appropriate changes he prefers that would be awesome. I've tried reading about how to post/change/log/properly release a photo but I'm not going to lie it's really confusing for me.

He would just like:

Tony Penikett: - Whitehorse City Councillor 1977-1979; - Member of the Yukon Legislative Assembly for Whitehorse West, 1978-1995; - Senior Advisor, Cabinet planning Unit, Government of Saskatchewan, Regina, 1995-1997; - Deputy Minister, Negotiations and, later, Labour, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, 1997-2001; - President, Tony Penikett Negotiations Inc., 2001

I was about to attach a picture but I really don't know how... I'll just try to change it again on the page and hopefully it sticks...If you could email me with help that would be awesome. Major help is needed...

I just attempted to change his page, I probably didn't do it quite right but i tried!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmlee28 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 30th, 2014

Hi Katieh5584, I did my best to follow all the rules of wikipedia, I added the CC Market to the photo before uploading it, I looked for references to the changes, and I fixed some other citations that were incorrect as well. I really hope that It doesn't not get wiped and changed back. Please help me with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmlee28 (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) hello Jmlee, I appreciate your endeavours to ensure the article is correct with up to date information. However it is clear from your edit summaries that you are personally connected to the subject. The conflict of interest policy states that you should not edit Wikipedia to advance your own interests, and you should rather have talk page discussions. I am concerned that you have removed large portions of content - representing basically all his political career - for no well explained reason. Note that what Tony wants on the page does not determine the contents of the article. I would recommend you either to undo your edits and re discuss them on the article talk page, or to post there explaining for what good reason, within Wikipedia policy, you removed that content. Wikipedia is not for personal image massaging. I am willing to engage with you, but I do not feel your edits are an improvement due to the huge content removal.

PS: to facilitate discussion, please sign your messages by typing four tildes like this: ~~~~. Thank you, BethNaught (talk) 18:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently reverted an edit I made to the Birch Society page; can you explain why or edit the page to insert the valuable, accurate information I added? There is indeed a widespread impression that the Birch Society is “radical right.” When most people think of the "radical right" they instinctively think of the religious right and Republican Party. I can supply you with endless examples of the fact that the JBS has been consistently and vehemently critical of the GOP for decades both for doling our billions in corporate welfare and for waging unconstitutional military operations, both overt and covert, all over the world. On both of these issues they align with the progressive left (though they would part with the left on what to do once the troops were home). Did you know this? If it is true, don’t you agree it is worth noting on the Wiki page? (I can supply endless links directly to their website and literature to prove this to you, but you’ll have to email me because I am just getting familiar with joining the talking/editing discussions and stumbling through the process. My email is redacted) 67.189.166.173 (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I received you message regarding an unsupported entry for Enrique Graf left from this IP address. This is a shared computer and it is likely that another individual made the entry. Can you be more specific as to the entry which was made so I can contact the individual for a citation? Thank you!167.7.219.28 (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]