User talk:GabeMc: Difference between revisions
→Megadeth: too busy at the moment, but maybe in a few days |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Hi, GabeMC! Do you remember me? We were working on a [[Cher]] peer review between December 2012 and February 2013, but stopped due to a simultaneous PR by Wikipedian Penguin. WP's PR is still open, but he's not answering for at least six months. Since our PR, the article has evolved and is now much better, though there are still issues to be worked on. If you have the time, we can continue our review or start a new PR. Sorry for my errors, I am STILL learning to speak English fluently. Hahaha. [[User:Lordelliott|Lordelliott]] ([[User talk:Lordelliott|talk]]) 01:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi, GabeMC! Do you remember me? We were working on a [[Cher]] peer review between December 2012 and February 2013, but stopped due to a simultaneous PR by Wikipedian Penguin. WP's PR is still open, but he's not answering for at least six months. Since our PR, the article has evolved and is now much better, though there are still issues to be worked on. If you have the time, we can continue our review or start a new PR. Sorry for my errors, I am STILL learning to speak English fluently. Hahaha. [[User:Lordelliott|Lordelliott]] ([[User talk:Lordelliott|talk]]) 01:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
: Hi, Elliot. Sorry, but I'm too busy with RL and my own Wikiprojects. I recommend closing any open peer reviews and requesting another. Or, just nom the article at FAC to get an idea of where it stands now. Cheers! [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 17:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC) |
: Hi, Elliot. Sorry, but I'm too busy with RL and my own Wikiprojects. I recommend closing any open peer reviews and requesting another. Or, just nom the article at FAC to get an idea of where it stands now. Cheers! [[User:GabeMc|<font color="green">GabeMc</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:GabeMc|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/GabeMc|contribs]])</sup> 17:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
:: Hi, Gabe. As you can see [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cher/archive2|here]], I asked for user PeterGriffin's help in some points he made about the prose in the lede, but I understand that he may not be able (time, interest in the subject) to help me. Unfortunately, there's not much I can do alone in terms of prose, and there are not many fluent English speaking users interested in helping too. So I'm giving up. Anyway, thanks for having helped me so much in our peer review. [[User:Lordelliott|Lordelliott]] ([[User talk:Lordelliott|talk]]) 18:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Comma== |
==Comma== |
Revision as of 18:43, 19 May 2014
If you are an unregistered user editing as an IP you may contact me at User talk:GabeMc/IP.
Cher Peer Review
Hi, GabeMC! Do you remember me? We were working on a Cher peer review between December 2012 and February 2013, but stopped due to a simultaneous PR by Wikipedian Penguin. WP's PR is still open, but he's not answering for at least six months. Since our PR, the article has evolved and is now much better, though there are still issues to be worked on. If you have the time, we can continue our review or start a new PR. Sorry for my errors, I am STILL learning to speak English fluently. Hahaha. Lordelliott (talk) 01:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Elliot. Sorry, but I'm too busy with RL and my own Wikiprojects. I recommend closing any open peer reviews and requesting another. Or, just nom the article at FAC to get an idea of where it stands now. Cheers! GabeMc (talk|contribs) 17:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, Gabe. As you can see here, I asked for user PeterGriffin's help in some points he made about the prose in the lede, but I understand that he may not be able (time, interest in the subject) to help me. Unfortunately, there's not much I can do alone in terms of prose, and there are not many fluent English speaking users interested in helping too. So I'm giving up. Anyway, thanks for having helped me so much in our peer review. Lordelliott (talk) 18:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Comma
I'd say that it should be "in" instead of "with": "The group adopted an experimental approach to composition, IN songs such as..." -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Megadeth
Hey, I'm not sure if the music is up your alley, but the Megadeth FAC has been sitting there for nearly a month with no reviewer other than me. I thought I'd ask you to chip in if you could find the time since you've got experience doing music FAs, and I think the article itself is pretty close to FA standard, if maybe not quite there yet. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 11:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- I've currently got my hands full at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band/archive1, and I'm not great at jumping around different topics, but if the barrage of comments subsides and we arrive at a consensus to promote, I'll re-evaluate my time and try to see if I can help out there. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 16:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)