Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

for dealing with the latest sock on Dave Snowden ----Snowded ^TALK 00:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 09:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katieh5584, can you help me please to change my nick name in english wikipedia to: محمد بوعلام عصامي«Md.Boualam»

Could you please check that for me. Thank you for your precious help and guidance.--محمد بوعلام عصامي (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you removed my edit to Martin (name) citing it as not constructive. It may not be to you but it was to me. Just so I can understand, why did you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.11.229.242 (talk) 20:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because you can't add yourself to the article.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1].— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continuous addition of weakly sourced controversial content by IP. Thank you. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hello katie :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.39.137.134 (talk) 11:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katieh5584, thank you for your advice about edits to the various references to the Smith Electric pages. I work for Smith and I am just cleaning up some inaccurate information. I hope that you agree my edits are clean, unbiased and heavily referenced.

I will work hard to ensure that I dont break the rules.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmithElectric (talk • contribs) 16:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HI Katieh5584, the changes I have made was on the basis of last profile view, he is currently working as "Hindu Extremist" that's why I have changed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llvllrcool (talk • contribs) 16:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the false information, my friends are stupid and i was away from my laptop and they typed in the false information, and obviously they did it again because i got a message saying i was warned, if you could find who ever else sent me a message and clear it up i would appreciate it.

Sorry about the false information, my friends are stupid and i was away from my laptop and they typed in the false information, and obviously they did it again because i got a message saying i was warned, if you could find who ever else sent me a message and clear it up i would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.138.183.240 (talk) 18:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Katieh5584. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at Vanja Bulić. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. The artilce was only created one minute before you tagged it, wait a bit before you tag pages or use {{uw-draftfirst}} :PTemplate:Z149 TheMesquito (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(@TheMesquito: almost {{Uw-dttr}}. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]

@Josve05a:I did not know about that, Whoops! Sorry @Katieh5584: !

No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]