Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:NovaSkola: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
NovaSkola (talk | contribs)
Replaced content with '{{archive box| * August 2011–June 2013 * June 2013–present }}'
Sandstein (talk | contribs)
You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)
Line 3: Line 3:
* [[/Archive 2|June 2013–present]]
* [[/Archive 2|June 2013–present]]
}}
}}

== February 2014 ==
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision,&nbsp;and for violating your topic ban at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=595043489#Section_blanking_by_user_Zimmarod, [[Image:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]]you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for '''2 months'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block.&nbsp;If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks]] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 22:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Reversal of enforcement actions|procedure prohibiting administrators]] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

Revision as of 22:09, 11 February 2014

February 2014

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your topic ban at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=595043489#Section_blanking_by_user_Zimmarod,
you have been blocked from editing for 2 months. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.  Sandstein  22:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.