Lexicon: Difference between revisions
Speling12345 (talk | contribs) Linguistics is a single, unified theory. |
213.246.95.212 (talk) paragraph order (opening), headings, some syntax/grammar, restricted use of bold |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{about|the linguistic concept}} |
{{about|the linguistic concept}} |
||
⚫ | Formally, in [[linguistics]], a '''lexicon''' is a language's inventory of [[lexeme]]s. Τhe word "lexicon" derives from the [[Greek language|Greek]] {{lang|grc|λεξικόν}} (''lexicon''), neuter of {{lang|grc|λεξικός}} (''lexikos'') meaning "of or for words"<ref>[http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Dlecikos λεξικός] in Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, ''A Greek-English Lexicon'' (Perseus Digital Library). Sc. βιβλίον "book").</ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Linguistic theories generally regard human languages as consisting of two parts: a lexicon, essentially a catalogue of a language's words (its [[wikt:wordstock|wordstock]]); and a [[grammar]], a system of rules which allow for the combination of those words into meaningful sentences. The lexicon is also thought to include [[bound morpheme]]s, which cannot stand alone as words (such as most [[affix]]es). In some analyses, [[compound word]]s and certain classes of [[idiom]]atic expressions and other [[collocation]]s are also considered to be part of the lexicon. [[Dictionary|Dictionaries]] represent attempts at listing, in alphabetical order, the lexicon of a given language; usually, however, bound morphemes are not included. |
||
⚫ | |||
Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, ''A Greek-English Lexicon'', on Perseus Digital Library</ref> (sc. βιβλίον "book"). |
|||
==Size and organization== |
== Size and organization == |
||
⚫ | Items in the lexicon are called |
||
⚫ | Items in the lexicon are called lexemes or word forms. Lexemes are not atomic elements but contain both phonological and morphological components. When describing the lexicon a reductionist approach is used, trying to remain general while using a minimal description. To describe the size of a lexicon, lexemes are grouped into lemmas. A [[Lemma (morphology)|lemma]] is a group of lexemes generated by inflectional morphology. Lemmas are represented in dictionaries by headwords which list the [[citation form]]s and any [[English irregular verbs|irregular forms]], since these must be learned to use the words correctly. Lexemes derived from a word by derivation morphology are considered new lemmas. The lexicon is also organized according to open and closed categories. [[Part of speech|Closed categories]], such as [[Determiner (linguistics)|determiner]]s or [[pronoun]]s, are rarely given new lexemes; their function is primarily [[Syntax|syntactic]]. Open categories, such as [[noun]]s and [[verb]]s, have highly active generation mechanisms and their lexemes are more [[Semantics|semantic]] in nature. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
{{anchor#Lexicalization}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | A central role of the lexicon is the documenting of established ''lexical norms and conventions''. [[Lexicalization]] is the process where new words, having gained into widespread usage, enter in the lexicon. Since lexicalization<ref name="Geert2005">{{cite book |last=Geert |first=Booij |title=The grammar of words : an introduction to linguistic morphology |series=Oxford textbooks in linguistics |year=2005 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-928042-8}}</ref> may modify lexeme phonologically and morphologically it is possible, that a single etymological source may be borrowed in two or more forms into a single lexicon. These pairs are called [[Doublet (linguistics)|doublet]] are often close semantically. Two examples are ''[[wikt:aptitude|aptitude]]'' versus ''[[wikt:attitude|attitude]]'' and ''[[wikt:employ|employ]]'' versus ''[[wikt:imply|imply]]''.<ref name="Skeat 2010">{{cite book |last=Skeat |first=Walter |title=A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=wRGhnkZq3HQC |date=2010-04-17 |publisher=Forgotten Books |isbn=978-1-4400-5722-9 |page=648}}</ref> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* '''Sound Change''' localised to specific words, phonotactics combination or systemic taking the form of a consonant or a [[vowel shift]]. |
|||
⚫ | * Innovation,<ref>{{cite book |last=Metcalf |first=Allan |title=Predicting New Words — The Secrets of Their Success |year=2002 |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Company |location=Boston |isbn=0-618-13006-3}}</ref> the planned creation of new roots (often on a large-scale), such as ''slang'', ''branding''. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* Sound change, a change such as a consonant or [[vowel shift]] localised to specific words or [[Phonotactics|phonotactical]] combinations. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
===New words=== |
===New words=== |
||
[[Neologism]] are new lexeme candidates which if they gain wide usage |
[[Neologism]]s are new lexeme candidates which, if they gain wide usage over time, become part of a language's lexicon. Neologisms are often introduced by children in a type of [[kid slip]].<ref name="Jaeger2005">{{cite book |last=Jaeger |first=Jeri J. |title=Kid's slips: what young children's slips of the tongue reveal about language development |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=g1YGd1FkRgAC |accessdate=8 April 2012 |year=2005 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-8058-3579-3}}</ref> Another common source is slang and activities such as advertising and branding. |
||
[[Neologism]] are also introduced by adults in marketing activities such as advertising and branding, and in slang. |
|||
===Loan words=== |
===Loan words=== |
||
Most innovations to a lexicon are either [[loan word]]s introduced by bilingual speakers during [[language contact]] or compound words created from existing morphemes. |
Most innovations to a lexicon are either [[loan word]]s introduced by bilingual speakers during [[language contact]] or compound words created from existing morphemes. Once a neologism or a compound is introduced to a language, then, if successful, it will often diffuse across geographical boundaries. |
||
Once a neologism or a compound is introduced in one languages if successful it will often diffuse across geographical boundaries. |
|||
=== |
===Role of morphology=== |
||
Another mechanism involves [[ |
Another mechanism involves [[Generative grammar|generative]] devices that combine morphemes according to a language's rules. For example, the [[Suffix (linguistics)|suffix]] "-able" is usually only added to [[transitive verb]]s, as in "read-able" but not "cry-able". |
||
===Compounding=== |
===Compounding=== |
||
A compound word is a lexeme composed of several pre-existing morphemes. Because a compound word is composed of established lexeme they are usually easier to acquire than loan words or neologisms. Their meaning is usually just a sum of their constituent parts. |
A compound word is a lexeme composed of several pre-existing morphemes. Because a compound word is composed of established lexeme they are usually easier to acquire than loan words or neologisms. Their meaning is usually just a sum of their constituent parts. The meaning of "[[wikt:armed and dangerous|armed and dangerous]]", for example, derives from the sum of its parts, while "[[wikt:armed to the teeth|armed to the teeth]]" involves [[metaphor]]. |
||
⚫ | Compound words that are not the semantical sum of their constituents can be interpreted through [[analogy]], [[Pragmatics|common sense and context]].<ref name="Geert2005"/> Compound words have simple morphological structures, where no more than one element usually requires inflection for agreement. On the other hand, they are subject to the rules of syntax and can contain gaps to hold other lexemes on which they operate. For instance: |
||
*[[wikt:armed and dangerous|armed and dangerous]] (sum of it words) |
|||
*[[wikt:armed to the teeth|armed to the teeth]] (metaphorical) |
|||
⚫ | |||
Compound words that are not the semantical sum of their constituents can be interpreted through ''analogy'', ''common sense'' and context<ref name="Geert2005"/> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
* "house"–"wife", becoming [[wikt:housewife|housewife]]. |
|||
⚫ | |||
* ''város''–''háza'' ("city"–"hall" in [[Hungarian language|Hungarian]]) becoming ''[[wikt:városháza|városháza]]''. |
|||
* ''rot''–''Licht'' ("red"–"light" in [[German language|German]]) becoming ''[[wikt:Rotlicht|rotlicht]]''. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Examples: |
|||
⚫ | |||
*[[wikt:housewife|house-wife]] |
|||
*[[wikt:városháza|város-háza]] (Hungarian) "city hall". |
|||
*[[wikt:Rotlicht|rot-licht]] (German) "red light". |
|||
⚫ | Comparative historical linguistics studies the evolutions languages and takes a [[Historical linguistics|diachronic]] view of the lexicon. The evolution of lexicons in different languages occurs through parallel mechanisms. Over time historical forces work to <ref>{{cite book |last=Deutscher |first=Guy |authorlink=Guy Deutscher (linguist) |title=The Unfolding of Language: An Evolutionary Tour of Mankind's Greatest Invention |date=May 19, 2005 |publisher=Metropolitan Books}}</ref> shape the lexicon, making it simpler to acquire and often creating an illusion of great regularity in language. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*Emphasis, the modification of words' stress and/or accenting. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Comparative historical linguistics studies the evolutions languages and takes a [[Historical linguistics|diachronic]] view of the lexicon. The evolution of lexicons in different languages occurs through parallel mechanisms. Over time historical forces work to <ref>{{cite book|last=Deutscher|first=Guy|authorlink=Guy Deutscher (linguist)|title=The Unfolding of Language: An Evolutionary Tour of Mankind's Greatest Invention |date=May 19, 2005|publisher=Metropolitan Books}}</ref> shape the lexicon, making it simpler to acquire and often creating an illusion of great regularity in language. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
*'''Emphasis''' - words are modified for effect of emphasis. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The term lexicon is generally used in the context of single language. Therefore, multi-lingual speakers are generally thought to have multiple lexicons. Speakers of language variants ([[Brazilian Portuguese]] and [[European Portuguese]], for example) may be considered to possess a single lexicon. Thus a ''[[wikt:cash dispenser|cash dispenser]]'' (British English) as well as an [[wikt:automatic teller machine|automatic teller machine]] or [[wikt:ATM|ATM]] in American English would be understood by both American and British speakers, despite each group using different dialects. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | The term lexicon is generally used in the context of single language. Therefore, multi-lingual speakers are generally thought to have multiple lexicons. Speakers of language variants ([[Brazilian Portuguese]] and [[European Portuguese]], for example) may be considered to possess a single lexicon. Thus a ''[[wikt:cash dispenser|cash dispenser]]'' (British English) as well as an [[wikt:automatic teller machine|automatic teller machine]] or [[wikt:ATM|ATM]] in |
||
When linguists study |
When linguists study a lexicon, they consider such things as what constitutes a word; the word/[[concept]] relationship; [[lexical access]] and lexical access failure; how a word's [[phonology]], [[syntax]], and meaning intersect; the [[morphology (linguistics)|morphology]]-word relationship; vocabulary structure within a given language; language use ([[pragmatics]]); [[language acquisition]]; the history and evolution of words ([[etymology]]); and the relationships between words, often studied within [[philosophy of language]]. |
||
Various models of how lexicons are organized and how words are retrieved have been proposed in [[psycholinguistics]], [[neurolinguistics]] and [[computational linguistics]]. |
|||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
* [[Grammaticalization]] |
* [[Grammaticalization]] |
||
* [[Lexical Markup Framework]] |
* [[Lexical Markup Framework]] |
||
==References== |
== References == |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
==Further reading== |
== Further reading == |
||
{{wiktionary|lexicon}} |
{{wiktionary|lexicon}} |
||
* [[Jean Aitchison|Aitchison, Jean]]. ''Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon.'' Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003. |
* [[Jean Aitchison|Aitchison, Jean]]. ''Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon.'' Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003. |
||
{{Lexicography}} |
{{Lexicography}} |
||
<!-- careful with interwiki: lexicon in many languages means "dictionary"; also, many of the links formerly here were to dab pages in other languages --> |
<!-- careful with interwiki: lexicon in many languages means "dictionary"; also, many of the links formerly here were to dab pages in other languages --> |
||
Revision as of 13:31, 28 December 2013
Formally, in linguistics, a lexicon is a language's inventory of lexemes. Τhe word "lexicon" derives from the Greek λεξικόν (lexicon), neuter of λεξικός (lexikos) meaning "of or for words"[1]
Linguistic theories generally regard human languages as consisting of two parts: a lexicon, essentially a catalogue of a language's words (its wordstock); and a grammar, a system of rules which allow for the combination of those words into meaningful sentences. The lexicon is also thought to include bound morphemes, which cannot stand alone as words (such as most affixes). In some analyses, compound words and certain classes of idiomatic expressions and other collocations are also considered to be part of the lexicon. Dictionaries represent attempts at listing, in alphabetical order, the lexicon of a given language; usually, however, bound morphemes are not included.
Size and organization
Items in the lexicon are called lexemes or word forms. Lexemes are not atomic elements but contain both phonological and morphological components. When describing the lexicon a reductionist approach is used, trying to remain general while using a minimal description. To describe the size of a lexicon, lexemes are grouped into lemmas. A lemma is a group of lexemes generated by inflectional morphology. Lemmas are represented in dictionaries by headwords which list the citation forms and any irregular forms, since these must be learned to use the words correctly. Lexemes derived from a word by derivation morphology are considered new lemmas. The lexicon is also organized according to open and closed categories. Closed categories, such as determiners or pronouns, are rarely given new lexemes; their function is primarily syntactic. Open categories, such as nouns and verbs, have highly active generation mechanisms and their lexemes are more semantic in nature.
Lexicalization and other mechanisms in the lexicon
A central role of the lexicon is the documenting of established lexical norms and conventions. Lexicalization is the process where new words, having gained into widespread usage, enter in the lexicon. Since lexicalization[2] may modify lexeme phonologically and morphologically it is possible, that a single etymological source may be borrowed in two or more forms into a single lexicon. These pairs are called doublet are often close semantically. Two examples are aptitude versus attitude and employ versus imply.[3]
The mechanisms, not mutually exclusive, are:[4]
- Innovation,[5] the planned creation of new roots (often on a large-scale), such as slang, branding.
- Borrowing of foreign words.
- Compounding (composition), the combination of lexemes to make a single word.
- Abbreviation of compounds.
- Acronyms, the reduction of compounds to their initial letters, such as NASA, laser (from "LASER").
- Inflection, a morphology change with a category, such as number or tense.
- Derivation, a morphological change resulting in a change of category.
- Agglutination, the compounding of morphemes into a single word.
In complex words, constituents may be dropped.[clarification needed]
Besides word formation, there are also mechanisms of lexeme change:
- Lexical replacement, the replacement of a lexeme or its sense.
- Sound change, a change such as a consonant or vowel shift localised to specific words or phonotactical combinations.
- Blocking the creation of new words while existing lexical conventions are maintained.
- Obsolescence of vocabulary; much slang, for example, typically has short lifespans.
New words
Neologisms are new lexeme candidates which, if they gain wide usage over time, become part of a language's lexicon. Neologisms are often introduced by children in a type of kid slip.[6] Another common source is slang and activities such as advertising and branding.
Loan words
Most innovations to a lexicon are either loan words introduced by bilingual speakers during language contact or compound words created from existing morphemes. Once a neologism or a compound is introduced to a language, then, if successful, it will often diffuse across geographical boundaries.
Role of morphology
Another mechanism involves generative devices that combine morphemes according to a language's rules. For example, the suffix "-able" is usually only added to transitive verbs, as in "read-able" but not "cry-able".
Compounding
A compound word is a lexeme composed of several pre-existing morphemes. Because a compound word is composed of established lexeme they are usually easier to acquire than loan words or neologisms. Their meaning is usually just a sum of their constituent parts. The meaning of "armed and dangerous", for example, derives from the sum of its parts, while "armed to the teeth" involves metaphor.
Compound words that are not the semantical sum of their constituents can be interpreted through analogy, common sense and context.[2] Compound words have simple morphological structures, where no more than one element usually requires inflection for agreement. On the other hand, they are subject to the rules of syntax and can contain gaps to hold other lexemes on which they operate. For instance:
- "another nail in" something/someone → "another nail in" "the company's" "coffin"
- "bring" something "to" someone's "attention" → "bring" "a problem" "to" "your" "attention"
Once new compounds are successfully established in one language they will often cross geographical boundaries:
- "house"–"wife", becoming housewife.
- város–háza ("city"–"hall" in Hungarian) becoming városháza.
- rot–Licht ("red"–"light" in German) becoming rotlicht.
Compounding tends to produce longer lexemes which may result in lexemes of unwieldy proportion. This is compensated by mechanisms that reduce the length of words.
Diachronic mechanisms
Comparative historical linguistics studies the evolutions languages and takes a diachronic view of the lexicon. The evolution of lexicons in different languages occurs through parallel mechanisms. Over time historical forces work to [7] shape the lexicon, making it simpler to acquire and often creating an illusion of great regularity in language.
- Phonological assimilation, the modification of loanwords to fit a new language's sound structure more effectively. If, however, a loanword sounds too "foreign", inflection or derivation rules may not be able to transform it.
- Analogy, where new words undergo inflection and derivation analogous to that of words with a similar sound structure.
- Emphasis, the modification of words' stress and/or accenting.
- Metaphor, a form of semantic extension.
Second-language lexicon
The term lexicon is generally used in the context of single language. Therefore, multi-lingual speakers are generally thought to have multiple lexicons. Speakers of language variants (Brazilian Portuguese and European Portuguese, for example) may be considered to possess a single lexicon. Thus a cash dispenser (British English) as well as an automatic teller machine or ATM in American English would be understood by both American and British speakers, despite each group using different dialects.
When linguists study a lexicon, they consider such things as what constitutes a word; the word/concept relationship; lexical access and lexical access failure; how a word's phonology, syntax, and meaning intersect; the morphology-word relationship; vocabulary structure within a given language; language use (pragmatics); language acquisition; the history and evolution of words (etymology); and the relationships between words, often studied within philosophy of language.
Various models of how lexicons are organized and how words are retrieved have been proposed in psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics and computational linguistics.
See also
References
- ^ λεξικός in Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon (Perseus Digital Library). Sc. βιβλίον "book").
- ^ a b Geert, Booij (2005). The grammar of words : an introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford textbooks in linguistics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-928042-8.
- ^ Skeat, Walter (2010-04-17). A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Forgotten Books. p. 648. ISBN 978-1-4400-5722-9.
- ^ Ornan, Uzzi (2003). The Final Word — Mechanism For Hebrew Word Generation (in Hebrew). Haifa: Haifa University Press.
- ^ Metcalf, Allan (2002). Predicting New Words — The Secrets of Their Success. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 0-618-13006-3.
- ^ Jaeger, Jeri J. (2005). Kid's slips: what young children's slips of the tongue reveal about language development. Psychology Press. ISBN 978-0-8058-3579-3. Retrieved 8 April 2012.
- ^ Deutscher, Guy (May 19, 2005). The Unfolding of Language: An Evolutionary Tour of Mankind's Greatest Invention. Metropolitan Books.
Further reading
- Aitchison, Jean. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.