Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Jonathan King: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Trfc06 - "need section for this please: "
No edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:
Lots of links confirming his links to him, this is in his own words. Due to his convictions for underage sex, and his many close links to other celebrity pesos, and what is now know re Jimmy and the interest in it I think this is relevant. Can anyone tell me how to add the section anfd links please? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 19:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Lots of links confirming his links to him, this is in his own words. Due to his convictions for underage sex, and his many close links to other celebrity pesos, and what is now know re Jimmy and the interest in it I think this is relevant. Can anyone tell me how to add the section anfd links please? <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 19:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== POV ==

== RVV ==

Vandalism reported


== NPOV dispute ==
== NPOV dispute ==
Line 71: Line 66:
Like I said, I will add every little npov on this page until it is a GOOD article. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 11:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Like I said, I will add every little npov on this page until it is a GOOD article. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 11:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:I am removing the POV tag as I think this article comes across as fairly neutral overall. By all means challenge individual sentences if you think they are POV, but I do not think a POV tag for the whole article is justified. -- [[User:Alarics|Alarics]] ([[User talk:Alarics|talk]]) 12:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
== This is really funny!!! ==

Look through to archives for this article on the talk page. JK created many accounts on here to back him self up and push through his opinion. Read the posts!! How easy is it to tell they are ALL written by him. All praise him sooooooo much, they all list many different things he wants people to think he achieved. I literally nearly died from laughing so much.

BUT, it gets better: Go to Amazon and read any review on any of his items, HE DID THE SAME THERE,but even more so. Have a look, its well funny. I have reported this to amazon by the way and asked that they check the details of the people who did the reviews and their IPs and remove them.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/65-My-Life-So-Far-ebook/dp/B003AU4WHY/ref=sr_1_7?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1387454317&sr=1-7&keywords=jonathan+king

But funny still!! <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 12:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== A message to JK ==

Im really not that bothered with your personal war to make this page make you look like a god! I really do have more important things to do. So, make all the changes you want, but remember one thing:
You will die one day, then this page will changed to the truth, and that is how you will be remembered for all history, just a poor mans Jimmy Saville. Bet your proud aren't you! <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Trfc06|Trfc06]] ([[User talk:Trfc06|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Trfc06|contribs]]) 12:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== need section for this please ==
== need section for this please ==

Revision as of 12:17, 19 December 2013

Former good articleJonathan King was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 19, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


lost its way

been reading all the archives on this page, very interesting. No-one has really looked at it for at least 2 years, in which time it has become, basically, a personally written love letter from the subject to himself. I will not bother with all the claims he makes for how important he is and all the wonderful things he has done and everyone loves him. I will not even alter all the claims he makes that he is innocent and the ECHR is looking at this miscarriage of justice personally, even though that was nearly 7 years ago! He really isnt that important, if you say his name now to anyone they ask who? Try it and see! I have simply added three words that show the boys he abused were under age. The way it is written looks like he simply had sex with men that were 18 or 19 and because of the wrong law re gay men he was convicted. He buggered, against their will, boys under 14. Only added 3 words, cant see any reason why they will be removed, and cant see why the fact they were teenagers should be listed either. The boys in question were under-age, he was convicted and went to prison for it. Please leave the edit as it is or discus? (17:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC))— Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfc06 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

editors needed, HOW BIASED IS THIS ARTICLE

No, this article is so over the top for him I cant just leave it. But I am new here and am asking all experienced editors to look at this article and correct all the reverts please. Even the opening paragraph, why re his few, not well know, films listed? Its not like that for successful actors. Then all hos books are listed. Then all his "hits" and all other claims. "I ran Deca" for example, something that was removed many times in the history of the archives because its not true and it cant be verified. Can someone please make this article a balance truthful one? I have marked it NPOV, bit dont know what else to do?(Trfc06 (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2013 (UTC))[reply]

King classes veteran TV presenter Jimmy Savile as one of his closest friends - they have known each other for 25 years. Savile once said of him: "He's a sabra. A sabra is an Israeli fruit that's prickly on the outside and all soft and lovely inside. That's Jonathan King."http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/nov/24/6 Lots of links confirming his links to him, this is in his own words. Due to his convictions for underage sex, and his many close links to other celebrity pesos, and what is now know re Jimmy and the interest in it I think this is relevant. Can anyone tell me how to add the section anfd links please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfc06 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


NPOV dispute

Please do not remove the NPOV banner until it has been discussed and agreed upon by the community. Please read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute

I have set this up the way Wiki says to and will add more NPOV opinions as we go. I have asked several well know editors to review the article and judge as well.

FIRST NPOV. Does not need the word teenage boys in what he was convicted for. This is done to imply that they were 16+ They were under 15. If the word teenager is left, then I suggest that we put the ages of the boys after that staement?

2nd King first came to prominence as an undergraduate at the University of Cambridge in 1965. Prominence is subjective, ask a person in Japn for example when did JK come to prominence and Im certain he would answer with this quote, or indeed any person anywhere in the world. This is put in to back up JKs claims that he is a prominent person. I will rewrite as" He when wrote and sang "Everyone's Gone to the Moon," which became an international best seller, while he was an undergraduate at Cambridge." Will change to this in 7 days unless anyone can tell me why its there?

Like I said, I will add every little npov on this page until it is a GOOD article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfc06 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the POV tag as I think this article comes across as fairly neutral overall. By all means challenge individual sentences if you think they are POV, but I do not think a POV tag for the whole article is justified. -- Alarics (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

need section for this please

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/JONATHAN+KING%3A+THE+VICTIMS+SPEAK%3A+Do+you+recognise+me%3F%3B+EXCLUSIVE%3A...-a080243027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfc06 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not a reliable source. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will get reliable sources today and put the links here. will be as quick as I can. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trfc06 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]