Talk:Jonathan King: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 7d) to Talk:Jonathan King/Archive 2. |
→lost its way: new section |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Featured article tools|1=Jonathan King}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Featured article tools|1=Jonathan King}}</noinclude> |
||
== lost its way == |
|||
been reading all the archives on this page, very interesting. No-one has really looked at it for at least 2 years, in which time it has become, basically, a personally written love letter from the subject to himself. I will not bother with all the claims he makes for how important he is and all the wonderful things he has done and everyone loves him. I will not even alter all the claims he makes that he is innocent and the ECHR is looking at this miscarriage of justice personally, even though that was nearly 7 years ago! He really isnt that important, if you say his name now to anyone they ask who? Try it and see! I have simply added two words that show the boys he abused were under age. The way it is written looks like he simply had sex with men that were 18 or 19 and because of the wrong law re gay men he was convicted. He buggered, against their will, boys under 14. Only added 2 words, cant see any reason why they will be removed. The boys in question were under-age, he was convicted and went to prison for it. Please leave the edit as it is or discus? |
Revision as of 17:07, 18 December 2013
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Jonathan King was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
Toolbox |
---|
lost its way
been reading all the archives on this page, very interesting. No-one has really looked at it for at least 2 years, in which time it has become, basically, a personally written love letter from the subject to himself. I will not bother with all the claims he makes for how important he is and all the wonderful things he has done and everyone loves him. I will not even alter all the claims he makes that he is innocent and the ECHR is looking at this miscarriage of justice personally, even though that was nearly 7 years ago! He really isnt that important, if you say his name now to anyone they ask who? Try it and see! I have simply added two words that show the boys he abused were under age. The way it is written looks like he simply had sex with men that were 18 or 19 and because of the wrong law re gay men he was convicted. He buggered, against their will, boys under 14. Only added 2 words, cant see any reason why they will be removed. The boys in question were under-age, he was convicted and went to prison for it. Please leave the edit as it is or discus?