Your recent changes to Complement (set theory) and Parity (mathematics) seem to consist primarily of unnecessary addition of < math> tags, and (in the case of Parity) unnecessary addition of symbols when the words are adequate. If you wanted to write:

it might make sense, but the mixed formulas and text is just jarring. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't words also adequate in the formal definition of relative complements? --BiT (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not convinced of that. There are too many pronouns to be sure of the meaning. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I'm sorry, I thought <math></math> was preferable to normally written formulae. --BiT (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only in displayed formulas. Inline <math></math> is to be avoided, and certainly to be avoided if it can be done in text. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the example in Parity something that should be <math></math>'d though, something like "∀k ∈ ℤ" looks far more legible as and the small explanation I added makes it all very clear in my opinion. --BiT (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect my excessive LaTeXisation does seem unnecessary. --BiT (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oint has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

LaTeX commands are not notable on their own (this is the only one in Category:TeX)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pnm (talk) 00:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ctypes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A disambiguation page for which there is only one actual Wikipedia article, and thus no ambiguation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Land of Lisp has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Template:Z78 Shadowjams (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BiT,

Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchukwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colon (punctuation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haskell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EdwardArmster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]