User talk:Blurred Lines: Difference between revisions
m →Misapplication of CSD: typo |
LudicrousTripe (talk | contribs) →Blurred BLurry!: new section |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::F3 means that the file is available under a licence which is non-commercial, non-derivative or only allows Wikipedia but no one else to use the image. It also says that the speedy deletion tag can be used for files which only are licensed under GFDL 1.2, but I don't think I have seen the tag used for such files. The file [[:File:HSBC new logo.jpg]] does not have any such copyright tag, so the tagging is patently false. |
::F3 means that the file is available under a licence which is non-commercial, non-derivative or only allows Wikipedia but no one else to use the image. It also says that the speedy deletion tag can be used for files which only are licensed under GFDL 1.2, but I don't think I have seen the tag used for such files. The file [[:File:HSBC new logo.jpg]] does not have any such copyright tag, so the tagging is patently false. |
||
::[[WP:CSD#F7]] tells that F7 may be used for "images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a {{tlx|Non-free logo}} tag on a photograph of a mascot)". The copyright tag claims that the image shows cover art although it clearly shows a logo, so the image seems to have a clearly invalid fair use tag per the formulation at [[WP:CSD#F7]], so {{tl|db-f7}} might technically be correct, but I would recommend correcting the tag instead as logos typically are allowed in cases like this. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 20:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
::[[WP:CSD#F7]] tells that F7 may be used for "images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a {{tlx|Non-free logo}} tag on a photograph of a mascot)". The copyright tag claims that the image shows cover art although it clearly shows a logo, so the image seems to have a clearly invalid fair use tag per the formulation at [[WP:CSD#F7]], so {{tl|db-f7}} might technically be correct, but I would recommend correcting the tag instead as logos typically are allowed in cases like this. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 20:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Blurred BLurry! == |
|||
Hey! You posted on my talk. There will be lots of issues with these journal miniature pics since the person who filled out my ''Dip History'' licensing info, [[User:Randykitty]], and whose licensing stuff I just copied for my ''J. Mil. Hist.'' is a major editor on the journal pages!!! [[User:LudicrousTripe|LudicrousTripe]] ([[User talk:LudicrousTripe|talk]]) 21:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:38, 4 October 2013
Move of Shediac-Cap-Pelé to Shediac-Beaubassin-Cap-Pelé
Actually, if you will check the edit summary from my move, you'll see that I did give a reason - the electoral district was renamed from Shediac-Cap-Pelé to Shediac-Beaubassin-Cap-Pelé. For source please see [1] or the article on it New Brunswick electoral redistribution, 2013. Can you please move the article back to Shediac-Beaubassin-Cap-Pelé where it belongs? - Nbpolitico (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- The move I made has been reverted, thank you for providing information, convincing be to bring it back the was it was. --Blurred Lines 01:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- If you're in the mood for moving pages, would you mind moving Moncton West to Moncton South? It used to be Moncton South, before being renamed Moncton West, and has now been renamed Moncton South again. Thanks! - Nbpolitico (talk) 01:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're gonna have to provide me a source that it was changed back to its regular name before I can do that. --Blurred Lines 02:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Same links as above, but you can see [2] and [3] for clarity. - Nbpolitico (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Since the page was already moved by request to WP:RM, this discussion is now over. --Blurred Lines 19:54, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- Same links as above, but you can see [2] and [3] for clarity. - Nbpolitico (talk) 14:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- You're gonna have to provide me a source that it was changed back to its regular name before I can do that. --Blurred Lines 02:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- If you're in the mood for moving pages, would you mind moving Moncton West to Moncton South? It used to be Moncton South, before being renamed Moncton West, and has now been renamed Moncton South again. Thanks! - Nbpolitico (talk) 01:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Non-free Photo
Greetings. You left a message on my talk page about a photo that I uploaded. I uploaded that by mistake, I later uploaded a better version. Please delete this File:SpiderScribe Logo.jpg Jacob Pabst (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- The file is already planned for deletion, as you may recall looking at the file. --Blurred Lines 19:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Misapplication of CSD
Please note that at least a few of your CSDs on images are not appropriate, and you probably need to review what NFCC allows and what CSD requires before application:
- [4] has an appropriate license, PD-textlogo. So the CSD is patently false.
- [5], which you used CSD F7 on which claims the image comes from a Commercial Source, is wrongly applied. We consider a Commercial Source to be a commercial entity that sells images for their livelihood, eg AP, Getty Images. Other images that may come from commercial entities but as part of their product are not considered coming from a commercial source. So this tag is wrong.
Some of your more recent CSDs are correctly applied, but these two stood out immediately on the your latest contributions. --MASEM (t) 18:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- First link you gave me, the CSD is not false. The file has a non free rationale, so that means that if the file has a rationale, and a non copyright license, it is considered for CSD.
- Also for the second link, you currently have the video game cover license when you described that the image is a logo. A video game cover license on a logo is invalid. If you get a chance, replace the license with the logo license, so it won't be deleted. --Blurred Lines 19:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- A file is non-free if it has a non-free copyright tag. {{PD-textlogo}} is not a non-free copyright tag, so File:HSBC new logo.jpg is not a non-free file. Free files should not have fair use rationales, but that is a separate matter. If a free file has a fair use rationale, then this should be converted to an {{Information}} template instead. This takes time, so it is not always done when a file has been mistagged and since corrected.
- F3 means that the file is available under a licence which is non-commercial, non-derivative or only allows Wikipedia but no one else to use the image. It also says that the speedy deletion tag can be used for files which only are licensed under GFDL 1.2, but I don't think I have seen the tag used for such files. The file File:HSBC new logo.jpg does not have any such copyright tag, so the tagging is patently false.
- WP:CSD#F7 tells that F7 may be used for "images or media with a clearly invalid fair-use tag (such as a
{{Non-free logo}}
tag on a photograph of a mascot)". The copyright tag claims that the image shows cover art although it clearly shows a logo, so the image seems to have a clearly invalid fair use tag per the formulation at WP:CSD#F7, so {{db-f7}} might technically be correct, but I would recommend correcting the tag instead as logos typically are allowed in cases like this. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Blurred BLurry!
Hey! You posted on my talk. There will be lots of issues with these journal miniature pics since the person who filled out my Dip History licensing info, User:Randykitty, and whose licensing stuff I just copied for my J. Mil. Hist. is a major editor on the journal pages!!! LudicrousTripe (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)