Note that WP:CSD#F7 doesn't apply to free files such as File:Etymological dictionary of Slavic languages 35.png. F7 can only be used for fair use files. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, files should not be tagged for deletion per WP:CSD#F11 if they have {{OTRS pending}} (see e.g. File:Caroline Brooks performing live in Los Angeles, CA.jpg). The {{OTRS pending}} template tells that an e-mail has been sent to WP:OTRS with evidence of permission, and files with this template are typically not tagged for copyright reasons until the OTRS clerks have had a chance to check whether a permission statement has been sent. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly the file that you mentioned the first time had a non free rationale box on the page, and it's not really a fair use file? --Blurred Lines 21:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file had a public domain copyright tag. It was therefore not a fair use file. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your right about the first part, but what I couldn't understand why there was a non free rationale box on the file. --Blurred Lines 19:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me about my university flags picture license. I do not hold any copyright of this picture, and I'm not the original creator (or the photographer of the picture). I believe the picture should be tagged with non-free fair use copyrighted image. Since its taken from IPB website and contains IPB logo and its faculties logos.

Please notify me if I make another mistake in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Auditore987 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, just next time when you upload the file, please add a copyright tag, and a non free rationale box if you don't own it, that way it won't be tagged for deletion. --Blurred Lines 19:46, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blurred Lines. I now see you have set up MiszaBot to archive threads on your own Talk page that are older than 24 hours. Do you believe that is appropriate? I am asking because I recently tried communicating with you (Heading: "Too eager"), and instead answering, you just let the bot archive messages that had been left that day, as if they had never existed. No link on your Talk page to retrieve archived messages added to the confusion. You also manually delete messages from your talk page if it suits you. I have asked User:Misza13 their thoughts on this. My suggestion is that you turn off the bot; allow other Wikipedians to converse with you and provide them answers; allow time for them to check back later to read your reply. —Prhartcom (talk) 12:43, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not tell me how to manage my talk page. If I want a bot to archive the messages that I get after 24hrs, let it be, that also includes me not having a archive box. I don't tell you how to manage your talk page, don't do it to me. Also, a user already responded to your ridiculous complaint. --Blurred Lines 19:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I only brought this up because you essentially deleted from your Talk page my original communication without answering it, which I still find really cowardly. —Prhartcom (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]