User talk:GabeMc: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Zeddman123 - "" |
Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) Revert to revision 565233704 dated 2013-07-21 20:39:10 by GabeMc using popups |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
: Never mind, no need as they have seemed to quite down since my response. [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 23:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC) |
: Never mind, no need as they have seemed to quite down since my response. [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 23:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Hypocrite == |
|||
And why don't you stay off my talk page please? I didn't realize it was YOUR talk page. What do you have against me exactly? Why are you being so hostile? Instead of getting all defensive why don't you tell my why you're giving me so much hate? You seem like a very bitter person that is for some reason extremely jealous over some Wikipedia work. |
|||
Don't add the formal request on MY page again, you opened the argument up and we discuss it here. What evidence do you have showing that I'm a sock/troll? Granted I'm VERY new to being a wikipedia user so I've made my mistakes and learned. Obviously this has traumatized you very badly. Don't message me again and stop stalking me please. I can handle and improve myself on my own. Now please leave me alone you strange strange person. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Zeddman123|Zeddman123]] ([[User talk:Zeddman123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Zeddman123|contribs]]) 20:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Revision as of 20:50, 21 July 2013
If you are an unregistered user you may contact me at User talk:GabeMc/IP
POV dispute
Hi. If it's no bother, could you comment at this discussion at Aaliyah (album)? It concerns this removal/revision made by an editor. Dan56 (talk) 21:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you but I noticed you had been a huge contributor to The Beatles article (well done on that by the way, it looks fantastic) and I thought you might be able to help. Yesterday, the New Brighton Tower article was on the front page DYK and someone pointed out that it is likely the hook used was incorrect.
"Did you know... that the Beatles played at New Brighton Tower (pictured) a total of 27 times, more than any venue except the Cavern Club?"
From briefly looking at the Beatles article the New Brighton Tower doesn't seem to beat the Hamburg venue. Would you be able to confirm if this was the second most played UK venue?
Thanks very much, ツStacey (talk) 10:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Stacey! After a quick perusal of Lewisohn I cannot say for certain that the Tower Ballroom was the Beatles' second most visited venue, but clearly it would appear to rank quite high, along with the Cavern club and others. I'll keep an eye out for a more definitive answer. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 18:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for your response =) I quite like the idea that it was the second most popular venue (but then I want the article to be interesting!) though I realise it needs to be factual too.. =P Thanks again! ツStacey (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
FAC comment
Hi. An editor that I rubbed the wrong way in a previous dispute may be using my FAC here as a venue for continuing their incivility. They appear to be making claims that are unlikely and posed only for the sake of argument. If I'm wrong, the FAC could you an opinion from an experienced editor either way. If it's no bother, could you comment/vote yourself at my nomination? It's a relatively short article to review. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 04:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind, no need as they have seemed to quite down since my response. Dan56 (talk) 23:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)