thank you! :) i am not web developing savvy and all of these codes are very new for me, but i am improving as i go and i am glad because i am learning something new :) but, for example, right now i don't even know where to write my response to your reply, i wrote on my talk page and then came here and i'm not even sure it's the right place, haha. thanks again! oh, and i think i messed up your talk page! sorry :/ Ketty Mora (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archives Archive 1 Archive 2

Hi, I see that you have added references to articles about three Ottoman grand viziers. Thanks for the contributions. Danişmend's book is a reliable source, but it is in Turkish. Excuse me for my curiosity. Do you know Turkish ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem with this. It's stubby. Some of the fish pages I've seen are one line, an infobox, & a stub tag. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 18:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can only say I screwed something up somewhere.... I'm not sure how. :( TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 23:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! SarahStierch (talk) 03:56, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You recently uploaded File:PhosphoriaFm.jpg but forgot to add a source and copyright tag. I assume you are familiar with doing this but if not consult WP:IUP, just ask me or the media copyright questions page. ww2censor (talk) 04:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The local media outlets called it a 'race war' at one time and that is what it is known as around the school and around the area, but unfortunately those articles were never posted on the internet. Also if you looked at my revised edit after reading your complaint, I did NOT put in the staff and there were also many problems with the article. It said the J.B. chambers performing arts center had four floors. The catwalk is not a floor. Also they had the wrong enrollment (2,000) when the West Virginia Department of Education says otherwise. I was trying to make the article as fair as possible as it says on the top of the article it is written as an advertisement. I tried to make it as neutral as possible and that includes those incidents. sportsfan123456789

teach me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcgamelover4life (talk • contribs) 17:06, 15 December 2012 (UTC) USERPAGES AND SIGNATURES. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcgamelover4life (talk • contribs) 15:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

do you mean this Dj hollygrove? if so, the reasons for all those old deletions shouldn't matter anymore. If you need any help editing, let us know

Ryan shell (talk) 02:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Hollygrove was deleted once again and I saw that someone else was also making a fuss about it! Macbookbro1 (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on POLARIS (seismology) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Mario (talk) 02:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

you are cool

PizzaDoe (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryan shell. You have new messages at Valleyspring's talk page.
Message added 01:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Cindy(talk to me) 01:42, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:

Template:Give me right direction about writing an article with an example.]]

Hi Ryan. This should help you write a solid first article. If you have any specific questions, I'd suggest you direct them to the Teahouse. Thanks. Go Phightins! 15:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thx Libertytree (talk) 11:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well its true rules are there to protect against biting other new or non-admin users,but this is just the half of the truth only, because the same rules are there to scare you off and the same rules are used by more experience users and admins to enforce what they think its correct,those users who are very good at making many threatens to new comers about you are breaking rules, you are gonna be banned etc.. adding for being accused from being disruptive,hinting about you are not honest,and finally listening to expressions as idiocy about your opinion,how in this world someone thins your opinion is an idiocy gonna take the discussion seriously?so yea the rules say we should discuss it so go to discussion for sake of following it not to make a real discussions about differences and solve it ,All what you are going to face at talk pages what I told you above,and since they had been long time wiki users,they seem work as groups working together so their is no way to really gain consensus (if you were lucky enough to push them into one ) or what would probably happen you say whatever you want but no one is really listening to you. like how in this world some admin can classified something as trivia while its classified on official website as a record?!I know its the club who owns the record official website classified and showing it as records but after all its an official website isn't it?! how come his own opinion is more valued than an official referenced website??how he has the power to ask another friend to impose a ban over editing this page for two weeks from further editing and ask you to discuss it while in over two weeks they didn't bother to answer you at all? all these questions lead you to the answers I told you about above,I sent my concerns before to some admin but he never really answered me,

anyway it doesn't matter anymore so don't get me wrong i don't care anymore about any of these pages because basically I'm not going to edit anymore its just time consuming to go into all these every time and listening to unnecessary insults. when i started editing i felt its easy way to pay back for wikipedia but now i know enough to be aware of how its works(maybe just in sport sections i worked with)and how its not as nice as it looks from outside .

Thank you for taking time to read all this .and happy new year .

Adnan_n2 Talk 12:03, 3rd Jan 2013 (UTC) .

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Wow you are really smart!! thanks for explaining that really well!! Gshaddix (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You like to give advice i like that in somebody. Gshaddix (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I did not personally "attack" anyone here/. this website is based on user reviews and relying on it's users. I feel insulted by what you people did. Now I'm attacking you RYAN SHELL. I feel personally insulted now by you and your colleague. Ban me if you want, but you sir have no scruples.

Mr. Ryan shell: I invite you to read the compilation of the discussions in my talk page here to receive your advise. Thanks —Preceding undated comment added 17:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Wiki administrators.

I was quite angry because you guys blocked my legitimate article on Grand Prince Jinan. After all, this is quite personal because he is my (figuratively speaking) grandfather and Sejong the great is our ancestor’s baby brother. So, I was angry cause you were challenging me.

My article is posted and legitimately posted. My other agents are stop working for your sake. Unblock my website. It is pretty legitimate website that you shouldn’t tinker with, or you can come to South Korea to deal with me.

Lee, Jyong Chul.
Founder and CEO
The Korean Monarchy and the Korean Royal Armed Forces Korea Reunification Party
(22nd in line House of Grand Prince Royal Jinan)

Ryan,

Thank you for your recent comments advising me to try and address the reviewers comments as to why my submissions are rejected.

When a reviewer simply puts (not supported by reliable sources) it really isn't helpful.

Here is my submission again. I have gone 'literally one sentence/claim at a time' in order to justify each sentence, and I have literally quoted newspaper articles, and re-worded (albeit closely) claims and comments by journalists.

More specific feedback would be far more helpful, but I can't get it.

I now run into month 4 of work on this. 4 months, to get one article published. Once i got a comment from an editor that said "well doesn't that tell you something?". Actually, in my view, it isn't up to 4 wiki editors whether or not the world gets access to or is entitled to read about the events in North Cyprus. It should be published, and the interest in the article should speak for itself.

Please help, once again. As for your other suggestion, just publish it and hope for the best, I have no idea how to do that. Please help again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kulaksiz_5_Court_Cases

ThanksToZero (talk) 09:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you Ryan, you are the first to be really positive and really helpful. ToZero (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who r u?--PercytheGreenEngine (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)PercytheGreenEngine[reply]

Hi Ryan,

Many thanks for your response to my feedback, I have spoken to Mean as Custard and he said that the reason my edits were removed was because "They seemed designed to promote a particular company's products", however given that they are in keeping with the lists they were added to, do you think it would be ok for me to undo his changes? He has not responded to my latest comment.

Many thanks SCBerry (talk) 10:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. My idea was to have a guided tutorial, which users would have to do before editing anything. Well, not a huge deal anyway.--Dravidianhero (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ryan! I'm a beginner and I have a problem that may be stupid, so I prefer to discuss it with you :-)  : I made a page for a best friend, Carmine Zoccali, an important colleague. Firstly I made the back bone of the page (and I was notified for deleting it because the lack of references), after some day I completed the page and the warning disappeared. The problem: when I open the page in a PC I see only the backbone of the page (the old version!) with the deleting warning. If immediately I make the login I can see the complete version (without the warning!). I'm confused! Why this happens? Where may I have some help? Thank you! Mauro561 Mauro561 (talk) 06:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ryan, please could you have a look at the draft version here? Best wishes, Menke66 (talk) 11:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ryan, how do I change my sandbox (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elisabeth Couperus-Baud back to the original sandbox? Best wishes, Menke66 (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has Wikipedia ever considered using a more simple and user-friendly approach to editing, as seen on Wikia? I'm Richer! (talk) 02:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've identified a few small issues with the citations; could you please fix them? Once those are done (and they should be easy), it will be ready to go. Please notify me when you're done, lest I forget to come back soon. Nyttend (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See here. Nyttend (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Coastrange sculpin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cottus, Washington State, Pores and Type locality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thank you again for the "little help" (above). another problem: recently in the same page (Carmine Zoccali) the photo was removed. I'm unable to understand why and how I can add again a photo without violating wikipedia rules. Can you help me? Thank you again! Mauro561 (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend (talk · contribs) 08:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan shell; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think making it a directory would work. I'm not sure why the formations listed are still in the original old article. Maybe I didn't disperse them to the child articles? Hmm... they seem to be listed in their proper child articles. I'll make a sandbox in my userspace in case we need it for something and convert the article to a directory. Thanks for calling my attention to this. Abyssal (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ryan shell. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:47, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Emk20 (talk) 16:57, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan shell :). Just a note that the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5 has now been re-enabled. Let us know on the talkpage if you spot any bugs. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 01:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]