This is a talk page for user AsceticRosé. Anyone can share his opinion frankly.

Having a section on Muhammad's "sublime character" is inappropriate for Wikipedia. We have to remain neutral, not everyone in the world agrees that he did have a "sublime character". Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Brough87 (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with statements like "Muslims believe that Muhammad is the last in a series of prophets sent by God." There's a lot wrong with saying that he actually was the last in a series of prophets sent by God. When describing beliefs, it's important to describe them as beliefs.—Kww(talk) 14:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your lead sentence was "Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim (Arabic: محمد بن عبد الله بن عبد المطلب‎) (c. 570 – 632), commonly known as Prophet Muhammad, was a messenger and prophet sent by God to guide the mankind to the right way." That's a belief, not a fact, and your statement presents it as a fact.—Kww(talk) 16:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's better. Linking "mainstream Muslim communities" to "Sunni Islam" is unacceptable, though. The Shiites would certainly be considered mainstream, and the Ibadi certainly aren't far out of the center.—Kww(talk) 17:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It can be used but the point is it would be a duplication of content and we have a template that can serve the purpose so its wiser to expand the template to server the purpose of infobox but if you are positive that the infobox should be added then i think we can start a consensus on the talk page.Thanks --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 16:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions and excellent edits. Kiatdd (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]