User talk:Maayaa: Difference between revisions
Elephantus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
WikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==WP:3RR on [[Dalmatia]]== |
==WP:3RR on [[Dalmatia]]== |
||
Hi. Please observe [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]] on [[Dalmatia]]. Thanks. --[[User:Elephantus|Elephantus]] 22:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. Please observe [[WP:3RR|the three-revert rule]] on [[Dalmatia]]. Thanks. --[[User:Elephantus|Elephantus]] 22:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Dalmatia== |
|||
Dalmatia article is an geographical article, not historical. Today, Dalmatia include only land in Croatia. Parts of Bosnia and Montenegro are not part of Dalmatia. They were part of Dalmatia in the past, but since this article is about present-day Dalmatia (not about historical one), we cannot consider that Boka and parts of Bosnia are part of Dalmatia. [[User:PANONIAN|<font color="blue">'''PANONIAN'''</font>]] [[User talk:PANONIAN|<font color="purple">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 22:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:35, 13 May 2006
Please, avoid changing the "Kaputt" chapter title - the correct one is Basket of oysters--Purger 21:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC) It is more useful to have a content description, than a chapter title. It is also more likely that people would click and then they would have the chapter title. So, this way is MUCH MORE INFORMATIVE! it seems to me that you want to obscure the content Maayaa 09:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
WP:3RR on Dalmatia
Hi. Please observe the three-revert rule on Dalmatia. Thanks. --Elephantus 22:15, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Dalmatia
Dalmatia article is an geographical article, not historical. Today, Dalmatia include only land in Croatia. Parts of Bosnia and Montenegro are not part of Dalmatia. They were part of Dalmatia in the past, but since this article is about present-day Dalmatia (not about historical one), we cannot consider that Boka and parts of Bosnia are part of Dalmatia. PANONIAN (talk) 22:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)