Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Portal talk:Business and economics: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
fx header
Line 57: Line 57:
== Please review [[Motivation crowding theory]] ==
== Please review [[Motivation crowding theory]] ==


A respondent to my request for peer review of [[Motivation crowding theory]] suggested that I ask for comments and article improvement ideas here. I am most interested in ideas for expansion. Please respond at [[Talk:Motivation crowding theory]]. Thank you!
A respondent to my request for peer review of [[Motivation crowding theory]] suggested that I ask for comments and article improvement ideas here. I am most interested in ideas for expansion. Please respond at [[Talk:Motivation crowding theory]]. Thank you! <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Selery|contribs]]) 16:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->


== Selected article, picture, economy, quote and Did you know? is missing ==
== Selected article, picture, economy, quote and Did you know? is missing ==

Revision as of 21:14, 26 July 2012

Former featured portalThis portal is a former featured portal. Please see the links under Portal milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed.
Portal milestones
DateProcessResult
December 23, 2006Featured portal candidatePromoted
October 3, 2010Featured portal reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured portal

Strong biais in an economics "good article"

The Income inequality in the United States article is listed as good article. In the introduction, it says that "A 2004 poll of 1,000 economists showed that the majority of economists favor "redistribution."[7]".

If you go check the references, you see (http://springerlink.metapress.com/content/w4q363786573275h/ ) that the poll is made on economists from the American Economic Association, which "heavily favor the Democratic party".

How can such a biaised article be labeled "Good article" in WP ??!!!! Eumachia (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs some help from people somewhat knowledgeable on the topic. Currently it keeps receiving imho questionable edits from a rather persistant IP.--Kmhkmh (talk) 00:47, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal Total category is up for deletion

Svick (talk) 13:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we work toward fixing the article Capitalism up

I suggest we work toward fixing the article Capitalism up, it seems fairly neglected and considering the scope of it's influence is important and should be represented accurately and completely on wikipedia. Financestudent (talk) 22:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A respondent to my request for peer review of Motivation crowding theory suggested that I ask for comments and article improvement ideas here. I am most interested in ideas for expansion. Please respond at Talk:Motivation crowding theory. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selery (talk • contribs) 16:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Selected article, picture, economy, quote and Did you know? is missing

Looks like they don't exist for several months anymore. Thank you for fixing. --Berny68 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]