If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Mabdul}} on your talk. If you want to ask me here why your AfC submission was declined, please go to our Help Desk or the Teahouse instead!

Archives

October 2008 - February 2010 March 2010 - July 2010 July 2010 - March 2011 End March 2011 - End July 2011 August 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - April 2012 (failed RfA) April 2012 - /barnstars

Hi, Mabdul. I am not able to view your signature with my settings. I have been asked to inform you to change your signature. Please see here. Axl ¤ [Talk] 19:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will think about it and change it slightly then. Wasn't aware of that problem. mabdul 10:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your consideration. In the interest of full disclosure, I have been subjected to opposition and even outright hostility over this matter, including a threat to take me to ANI. If you choose not to change your signature, I shall respect your decision. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

see de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Mabdul -- Cherubino (talk) 08:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mabdul,

I see that you are fairly active in maintaining the "Comparison of Project Management Software" page. Would you be able to assist me with adding a listing for InterPlan Systems' ATC Professional software to the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Interplansystems (talk • contribs) 10:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I have registered a new (personal) user name as directed (formerly Interplansystems). I do not wish to run afoul of wikipedia's guidelines. Bern68 (talk) 17:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great. At the moment our decision on the comparison is, that we add only articles which have an article (read the relevant essay: WP:WTAF).

So we have to create an article for that first. Please read first WP:REFB (how to insert references), WP:42 (which kind of references we do need, read also the links linked on that page, that is very important!) and finally go to Wikipedia:Article_wizard/Ready_for_submission and choose a good name and hit create submission.

A reviewer (maybe me) will review your submission. Be prepared: most submissions will get declined before they are accepted, that's no shame, simply correct the issues and rerequest a review. I will follow your edits and will try to help you. After the article is accepted, we simply can add the software to the comparison. ;)

Regards, mabdul 13:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Thanks for uploading File:The Odd Saga of the American and a Curious Icelandic Flock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 07:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the helpful links. I tried to copy the same format used by some of the other software listings on the page and adapt them. I could not figure out how to include a company logo or screenshot image, so I left them out of the info box. Hopefully you can see what I did here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/ATC_Professional

Bern68 (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have the time to review your submission. Please wait until another 'reviewer' does it. Regards, mabdul 11:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Account Creation Barnstar
	For all your work at ACC with over 1001 account creations. Good job :-) -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 19:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, thanks. That is really an impressive big number if I think that I started less than a year ago at ACC! mabdul 11:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at this article Talk:DJ Super Duke (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:DJ_Super_Duke) and let me know if it meets the criteria please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usmanwardag (talk • contribs) 04:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I submitted your draft to our 'Articles for Creation' system since I have not the time to review it for you. Sorry, but we are heavily backlogged and thus your submission might need a week to get reviewed. Regards, mabdul 11:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I missed: Your submission is now at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DJ Super Duke. Feel free to improve it ;) mabdul 11:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there You were very helpful with my first article. I have made lots of changes to try and comply with wiki policies. Would you be so kind as to have another look?

Thank you (Gmet49 07:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmet49 (talk • contribs)

It's good to see that you still developing and improving that article. The main problem of this article that it lacks independent, third party and reliable references. Click on that link and read the related articles. Add (online/offline) newspaper articles, (online/offline) magazine articles, (online/offline) books, etc. about him, not by him. mabdul 08:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, how goes the work for the FFU update? I don't do much work at FFU, but this patch seems really useful for the people that do help there. Another quick thing, I jotted down some bugs I noticed in my sandbox. Could you look into these? Thanks, Nathan2055^talk 18:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although AFCH gets many updates recently (as we disccued this in the IRC), I couldn't jumped in the FFU part, but it is on my list! ;-) mabdul 15:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Q[reply]

Resolved

Are there rules against using a photo in more than one article, or is there a specific procedure to follow?? i recently made a series of revisions to the tattoo, temporary tattoo & body art articles. As part of those revisions i also inserted a ballpoint pen tattoo photo currently viewable in the Lennie Mace article, BUT, the image is not appearing in the revisions mentioned above. i believe someone may have already deleted the data from one of the articles because of this mistake. Any advice or assistance appreciated, thanks.Penwatchdog (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I found the problem: next time double check the file name (and of the extension): your image doesn't include tatoo, but drawing! I fixed the articles. Regards, mabdul 08:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi Mabdul, i just made the extensive revision i'd been planning. as i expected, there are problems with reference formatting; as far as i know, i did as i was instructed... anyway i'd like to ask you to take a look when you have a chance (or maybe someone else will get to it before you?). also, problem with the ballpoint tattoo photo i mentioned in another message have apparently been fixed by someone (THANKS to whomever!) BUT the same thing happened now when i added the same photo to the ballpoint art page. is there a procedure i'm missing that i can make note of for thwe future?Penwatchdog (talk) 02:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy Penwatchdog. You're certainly an excellent writer and you're doing a fantasic job on referencing. Good work. I fixed the referecning stuff here and the picture stuff here. All the best to you my friend. 64.40.54.192 (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the ping in ACC, it was important, Thanx Mlpearc (powwow) 01:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yw. mabdul 15:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mabdul, thank you for reviewing my 'iDonate' submission to Wikipedia. I am also interested in becoming more involved in contributing to wikipedia. I am interested in the review process as this is my first article creation.

I look forward to your feedback on iDonate. I found some of the research difficult as there is no other provider offering this range of services. The online donations and fundraising pages are common - white label is unusual and not offered by others. SMS texting is very new and evolving.

The online charity shop is very unique and offers huge fundraising potential to the charities. Lots of charity shops see this as a new opportunity to raise much needed funds.

I look forward to hearing from you. Regards Paddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poshpaddy (talk • contribs) 14:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Mabdul. A couple of days ago I self-nom'ed the Lennie Mace article with a hook about his ballpoint pen Mona Lisa. I just noticed it was removed from that talk page (although it still appears on another page with all waiting noms), but it doesn't appear (yet) in the queue page. There may have been many flaws to the entry but... Any other way to track that besides just continuing to check the afformentioned pages?Penwatchdog (talk) 03:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RM (talk) 12:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added verifiable references as suggested. Will you please review and let me know if this is meeting the guidelines. Thx. RM (talk) 12:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.