I have protected the page in an effort to get you two to discuss it, and a mediator may have a look at it if assistance is needed. Redwolf24 (talk) 23:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You have written that you were interested in reading my contributions. I have created an overhauled article that fixes the major issues that I percieved, namely, lack of flow, structure, and npov. I have started an RFC on the issue already. I perceive you as a balanced editor, I am interested in reading your assessment of my article, be it praise or criticism. Dabljuh 22:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's my conclusion that no mention of CA-MRSA will be allowed under any condition. Likewise, the issue of bleeding in babies with undiagnosed coagulation issues has been censored repeatedly and will not be allowed. There is a group of like-minded admins that ensures this and bans anyone who gets in their way. See my talk page for examples. Alienus 10:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I told you so. Alienus 16:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in the events at User:Jakew/Alienus_RFC, or not. Up to you. Alienus 17:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for weighing in. I do have one suggestion. I notice that, after acknowledging what you consider to be unacceptable incivility (presumably by me, though you might have meant others), you go on to describe some rather nasty tricks that some (unspecified) people use to get their way. I wonder if you might be willing to be more specific about who is doing what. If you mean me, please say so. If you mean someone else, likewise. Anyhow, that's my suggestion. Alienus 01:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RFM-Filed

Alienus 02:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]