Hi January. FYI and [1]. Thank you. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 10:47, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was fully protected. Maybe the protecting admin thought the dispute was between the two of us. Regardless, you win some you lose some. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 04:46, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for your input to the article. I've been struggling with that on my own for a while now. January (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Just trying to help you out. Personally the subject of the article leaves me completely indifferent to say the least. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 20:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi January, why have you not replied to my latest point in the discussion of above article?

87.228.193.254 (talk) 16:09, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping deal with the backlog at Category:Non-free images with orphaned versions more than 7 days old. Please note, however, that merely deleting the old versions of the iage doesn't remove it from the category - pleasse also remove the {{orphaned fair use revisions}} tag from the image description page. While a bot to do this does aparently exist, when a call for admins to clear out the category is made, and multiple admins are doing it at the same time, these images should be removed in real time. As far as I can tell, the bot doesn't actually do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Od Mishehu (talk • contribs) 13:18, 18 December 2011‎ UTC