Talk:Mandukya Upanishad: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
92.3.100.150 (talk) →Strong Buddhist bias in this article: new section |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Does anyone know the source for the quote in the article: "who is neither inwardly nor outwardly aware, nor both inward and outward, nor with consciousness infolded on itself.... who is unseen and ineffable, ungraspable, featureless, unthinkable and unnameable."? This quote is not from the next citation: Hajime Nakamura, Trevor Leggett, A history of early Vedānta philosophy, Part 2. Reprint by Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 2004 page 285. This citation is, upon checking the book, really only directly for the last sentence, "It is referred to as atyanta-shunyata (absolute emptiness)." [[User:Arapacana|Arapacana]] 14:24, 7 December 2011 |
Does anyone know the source for the quote in the article: "who is neither inwardly nor outwardly aware, nor both inward and outward, nor with consciousness infolded on itself.... who is unseen and ineffable, ungraspable, featureless, unthinkable and unnameable."? This quote is not from the next citation: Hajime Nakamura, Trevor Leggett, A history of early Vedānta philosophy, Part 2. Reprint by Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 2004 page 285. This citation is, upon checking the book, really only directly for the last sentence, "It is referred to as atyanta-shunyata (absolute emptiness)." [[User:Arapacana|Arapacana]] 14:24, 7 December 2011 |
||
== Strong Buddhist bias in this article == |
|||
I noticed there was a very strong Buddhist bias in this article. The usage of declarative |
|||
statements like, "It IS influenced by Mahayana Buddhism' and 'It clearly is inspired by |
|||
Buddhism' significantly dilute the impartiality of this article and gives it a very Buddhist |
|||
spin. I am leaving this note for the consideration of potential editors. |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/92.3.100.150|92.3.100.150]] ([[User talk:92.3.100.150|talk]]) 21:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:32, 19 December 2011
![]() | India Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Hinduism: Philosophy Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Added the URL for the Musical version of the Mandukya Upanishad composed by Pandit Jasraj
--203.118.135.21 22:49, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Ganesh
The exposition is largely from the Karika called "Sri Ramakrishana Deepa" published by the Ramakrishna Mutt. This Upanishad has only twelve verse, so it is possible to include a line-by-line translation. Can someone, preferably someone well versed in Sanskrit, do it? - Gopalan evr (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know the source for the quote in the article: "who is neither inwardly nor outwardly aware, nor both inward and outward, nor with consciousness infolded on itself.... who is unseen and ineffable, ungraspable, featureless, unthinkable and unnameable."? This quote is not from the next citation: Hajime Nakamura, Trevor Leggett, A history of early Vedānta philosophy, Part 2. Reprint by Motilal Banarsidass Publ., 2004 page 285. This citation is, upon checking the book, really only directly for the last sentence, "It is referred to as atyanta-shunyata (absolute emptiness)." Arapacana 14:24, 7 December 2011
Strong Buddhist bias in this article
I noticed there was a very strong Buddhist bias in this article. The usage of declarative statements like, "It IS influenced by Mahayana Buddhism' and 'It clearly is inspired by Buddhism' significantly dilute the impartiality of this article and gives it a very Buddhist spin. I am leaving this note for the consideration of potential editors.
92.3.100.150 (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)