User talk:SakyaTrizin: Difference between revisions
DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) Giving DYK credit for Neolithic Tibet on behalf of Casliber |
Celinabluewick (talk | contribs) →Add opinion of another editor regarding Tibet: new section |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#15 August 2011|15 August 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Neolithic Tibet]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the divergence in the [[Sino-Tibetan languages|Sino-Tibetan]] language family between the [[Sinitic languages]] in China and other [[Sino-Tibetan]] languages likely occurred during '''[[Neolithic Tibet|Neolithic migrations into the Tibetan plateau]]''' from the Neolithic cultures of the [[Yellow River]]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Neolithic Tibet|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Neolithic Tibet]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Neolithic Tibet|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Neolithic Tibet]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201108/Neolithic_Tibet quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#15 August 2011|15 August 2011]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Neolithic Tibet]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the divergence in the [[Sino-Tibetan languages|Sino-Tibetan]] language family between the [[Sinitic languages]] in China and other [[Sino-Tibetan]] languages likely occurred during '''[[Neolithic Tibet|Neolithic migrations into the Tibetan plateau]]''' from the Neolithic cultures of the [[Yellow River]]?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Neolithic Tibet|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Neolithic Tibet]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Neolithic Tibet|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Neolithic Tibet]].}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201108/Neolithic_Tibet quick check])</small> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
||
}} [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC) |
}} [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Add opinion of another editor regarding [[:Tibet]] == |
|||
Hello Sakya Trizin, |
|||
As a previous editor of the [[:Tibet]] page, may I request you to refer to the page again under the Demographics section, for another opinion on recent edits? I believe the page may be currently hijacked by pro-communist China whereby there is an attempt to exclude foreign statistics, and to politicise the Dalai Lama by using non-neutralist terms (compare edits by me and two other users, Quigley and Tartanator). |
|||
Thank you. --[[User:Celinabluewick|Celinabluewick]] ([[User talk:Celinabluewick|talk]]) 17:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 2 October 2011
Welcome!
|
Your recent work in history of Tibet
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Please use the talk page to propose major changes like changing the titles of articles. Don't just change them yourselves without prior discussion. Thanks. Bertport (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't mean to walk over your edit just now. Bertport (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Tibet under Yuan administrative rule
—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Proposed Tibetan naming conventions
A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 16:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dec1/5dec1801a9e3646a40df0ff60690d4adb8a4f957" alt=""
Hi SakyaTrizin,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
---|
DYK for Neolithic Tibet
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Add opinion of another editor regarding Tibet
Hello Sakya Trizin, As a previous editor of the Tibet page, may I request you to refer to the page again under the Demographics section, for another opinion on recent edits? I believe the page may be currently hijacked by pro-communist China whereby there is an attempt to exclude foreign statistics, and to politicise the Dalai Lama by using non-neutralist terms (compare edits by me and two other users, Quigley and Tartanator). Thank you. --Celinabluewick (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC)