Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Robert of Ramsor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Theseus1776 (talk | contribs)
Invitation: new section
Theseus1776 (talk | contribs)
Line 680: Line 680:


{{WP Arminianism/Invitation}}
{{WP Arminianism/Invitation}}

== Welcome to WikiProject Arminianism! ==

Welcome to WikiProject Arminianism! Are you willing to help clean up the project page, invite new editors, and help expand the project? We are in the early stages of the project, but need to work hard to catch up to our Calvinist brothers. Also, a project on Methodism is not really needed since there is already a work group on the topic. I wouldn't be against one, however I think we should focus on the Arminian project first then see what else is needed. Again, thanks for your contribution![[User:Theseus1776|Theseus1776]] ([[User talk:Theseus1776|talk]]) 14:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:30, 26 September 2011


Welcome!

Hello, Robert of Ramsor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Flex (talk/contribs) 05:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

reply to Flex

Thanks for the welcome and links to the Tutorial etc. I originally logged on since I felt that contributions as large as I was making (I have added 2 paragraphs to the Hugh Bourne article) were better done by someone who did not remain anonymous. I have some interest in Methodist history, and was pleasantly surprised to find that the originator (presumably) of this article had linked to a biography of Bourne which I posted some years ago on my web site. My original choice of user name was already taken, and I thought that this one would probably be unique. I have Methodist ancestors from Ramsor, Staffordshire, and it is one of the significant places in Primitive Methodist history.

I looked at your Talk Page, and found so many posts I thought it best to reply to you here. As far as I can see, the only means of posting in this way is to use the Edit Page option, which also means learning the peculiarities of the Wiki codes for formatting. I will now add the 4 tildes and see if it works for me.

Robert of Ramsor (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Using the Preview option, I see that it has added my signature.[reply]

Again, welcome. If I can help you, feel free to ask on my talk page (don't bother about it being lost -- I get messages when someone posts there). --Flex (talk/contribs) 02:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Robert of Ramsor! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Tinucherian (talk) 02:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]
Getting Started
Useful Links
Miscellaneous
Work Groups
Projects
Similar WikiProjects

DYK

Updated DYK query On 4 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article H B Kendall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Updated DYK query On 4 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ramsor, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Maxim(talk) 21:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues

Hello. Take a look at my recent edits to Methodist Union. Wikipedia:Manual of Style calls for fairly sparing use of capital letters in section headings. Thus "See also" and "External links", with lower-case "a" and lower-case "l", are correct. In the case of "Hymn Book" I decided it could be considered an abbreviation of the book title, so I left the "B" as capital, but since book titles are to be italicized, I set that section heading in italics. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Methodism

I think the best way to proceed with a possible Methodism group would be to list one on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals page, and see if it gets sufficient interest. The proposal is now listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Methodism. My guess is it will garner enough interest.

Regarding the changes to the articles, I think what you're basically talking about is to set up those sections in accord with Wikipedia:Summary style, which is something we would all clearly have no objections to. Whether they would be necessarily be identical in both articles is possibly questioinable, but the idea is definitely in accord with wikipedia editing guidelines. John Carter (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you - Tinucherian (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copying my note on Methodist doctrine from Methodism discussion

This is what I posted on the Methodism article Discussion page about my Difference between arminianism and calvinism. I have copied it here in case anyone wants to discuss this on my Talk rather than the wider Methodism pages.

note in Lead on armininanism calvinism difference

Please note that this needs moving (later, when the whole article is further revised) from the Lead section to one on Beliefs in the article body, since the Lead is too long. I hope to work on this in April to cut down the number of words in the Lead.

I have changed back to what I said on the distinction between arminianism and calvinism for the following reasons.

My original is

The primary difference is that Arminians interpret the Bible as teaching that the saving work of Jesus Christ is for all people (general atonement} but effective only to those who believe in accordance with the Reformation principles of Grace alone and Faith alone. Calvinists emphasize the deterministic interpretation of Election, that salvation is only for a few decreed by God (limited atonememt) while all others are decreed to be condemned.

end of extract.

A. Jacobus Arminius and John Wesley are fully within Reformation principles and thinking. Note that I did not say Reformed here, partly because some calvinists equate reformed with calvinist ignoring the wider strands of the Reformation. The principles known as the "4 Solas" (or 5 in some lists) are common ground between arminians and calvinists.

B. "Election to damnation" is one of the basic tenets of calvinism (though not part of the TULIP summary), as is "limited atonement". (I think it is the 1659 Particular Baptist Confession, I need to check when I get time.) On calvinist discussion web sites (example, Challies), some refer to unbelievers as "VOWFTD" - "vessels of wrath fitted to destruction". While I would not include this in a Wikipedia article, it can be found by anyone looking at these discussions.

C. As an engineer by training, I see the calvinistic emphasis on the decrees of God from the beginning of eternity as being deterministic, hence including the term.

I therefore maintain that my original (accepting with thanks the edit by KitHutch) is an accurate and factual description and I therefore stand by it as according with Wikipedia principles. But there may be a case for inserting a note that calvinists also accept the Solas.

Robert of Ramsor (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correction - Baptist Confession is 1689 not 1659. Anyone who reads Section 3, on God's Decree, cannot fail to see either determinism or election to damnation. By way of example, young Andrew Fuller (1754-1815) scandalised the society of Soham Baptist Church for rebuking a fellow member for drunkenness; the pastor excused Fuller for his youth, and argued responsibility for keeping from open sins, and was forced to resign; the man admonished by Fuller "smelt ... the Arminian heresy that a man could be his own keeper in matters of conduct." (Griffiths, "A pocket History of the Baptist Movement", p.109) Yet calvinist Paul Washer is preaching this "arminian heresy" of holy living as vigorously as John Wesley. (I am giving reference for my original statement, not advocating a doctrine.) I need to add the 1689 Confession as a reference to the Methodism article. Robert of Ramsor (talk) 20:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is (or so I understand) not the place to debate issues of doctrine in great detail. But I think it is allowed to debate references to primary material to authenticate particulars (no pun on calvinistic baptists intended) in articles. BTW, I find that I have contributed 11 references on the numbered list of 20, just on my revision of the Lead section alone. Robert of Ramsor (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

Christianity WikiProject Newsletter - July 2008

This Newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Ellaston

Thanks for the heads up. I have made some edits to the article to bring it in line with WP:OVERLINK and MOS:SYL. By the way, the correct disambiguation for "English Civil War" is English Civil War. Regards, Ground Zero | t 02:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three Shires Head

Thanks for your comment on this (which I've moved by the way - by convention these usually go on the User Talk page not the User page). There are of course many of these '3 shires' places (there is one called Three Shires Stones near us, which I didn't know about until it started appearing on Tesco egg-boxes). Yes you're right about the Dove, but somehow Derbyshire always calls the shots on Peak District matters ('Some of the best bits of 'Derbyshire' are in Staffordshire'... and under the Maud report on local governement of the early 70s nearly where in reality :-)). Bob aka Linuxlad (talk) 08:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pass, I've not got involved in Co ordinates and the maps yet. I'd seen the comment about it not liking boundaries on the talk page. Did not get what you mean about it showing Edinburgh at first but i see what you mean on the Hollinsclough map about it goeing a bit out. I'll copy question over to Keith D on the Yorkshire project and see if he can help or point out an expert. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

H B Kendall

I am new to contributing to Wikki and not au fait with its netiquette and nuances [so I hope I am posting this right]. I have been researching the KENDALL family for about 25+ years [I am a descendant]. I have extensive knowledge and collected vast amounts of data for them. Which I am using in a book I am currently writing on them and this takes all of my free time at the minute.

As a family historian I know there was no standardisation of spellings of names [you have noted this]. Bickerstaff can indeed be spelt with or without an 'e', in my own documentation for the family the spelling switches between both. However from family knowledge [I am in touch with several of HBK'S descendants] and some of the documentation I have; we know Holliday went by the name of H. Bickerstaffe Kendall and not H.B. Kendall [his descendants also use the 'e']. A biography in the Aldersgate Magazine p396-397 1919; the Primitive Methodist Magazine of 1900 p723-4; the PM minutes 1919 p274, Who Was Who vol II (1916-1928)and the book Ministers and Probationers with circuits etc 1963 [Martin & Sheldon] and his gravestone; all use H. Bickerstaffe Kendall. In his will he uses his full name; again with addition of an 'e'. So for the sake of continuity I have used Bickerstaffe with an 'e' in my research. There is also an online portrait for him in the New York Public Library Digital Archive which also uses the 'e'.

http://digitalgallery.nypl.org/nypldigital/dgkeysearchdetail.cfm?trg=1&strucID=1024727&imageID=1547720&parent_id=1023696&word=&snum=&s=&notword=&d=&c=&f=&sScope=&sLevel=&sLabel=&total=1&num=0&imgs=12&pNum=&pos=1

Whilst I agree William Leary is an excellent staring point for Methodism [he helped me immensely after personal contact in starting my book] My research into Methodism has shown there are discrepancies and errors in his works [just like HBK and probably mine]. Leary's "Directory of Primitive Methodist Ministers and their Circuits" is a secondary source. Leary may have made the errors in transcription or the anomaly comes from the original document(s) for the missing 'e'.

I am not sure what you mean in this sentence "Bickerstaff is NOT listed in Leary, so was not a Primitive Methodist Minister."

I was very pleased to see your addition to Wikki for HBK. At long last an opportunity for his story to be told. You asked for contributions and sources to this entry which I have duly supplied. I would love to add more but have no idea how to upload images and it is all still a steep learning curve for me. My main priority at the minute is completion of my book and so I do not have the time to devote to Wikki at the moment. Ironically my final chapter is that of HBK. Today I have been to take photographs of William Clowes and other noteworthy PM's of Hull headstones [what a sorry sight it was](MBorrill (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I found the Wikipedia article while preparing for the anniversary of a General Baptist church which split off from a Particular Baptist church in 1833. A personal viewpoint here. The number of hymns celebrating Election seems to me to show a distortion, by taking one small point and magnifying it out of all proportion. Which is how error starts. (I will probably have many of the calvinists after me like a Synod of Dortrecht.) A couple of William Gadsby's very good hymns are used in the book Christian Hymns (Evangelical Movement of Wales, Bryntirion Press), and I quoted one of these in my sermon. But I have to look to Wesley for a truer understanding of such doctrine as Election. Thank God for those who have continued to bring received doctrine into line with what the Bible has to say. Robert of Ramsor (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Chance

I just redirected the article Joseph Chance to Chance Brothers. In case you want to keep some of the content for the article Chance Brothers, here it is:
Joseph Chance gave his name to a glass manufacturing company which was one of the largest such companies in 19th century Britain. The Chance Glassworks was located in the industrial area between Smethwick and Oldbury in the Black Country. This site is now bisected by the M5 motorway betweens junctions 1 and 2, where two of the ornate buidings make prominent landmarks. The southern section of the glassworks site is now an industrial estate whose origins are commemorated in the road name Crystal Drive. One of the many significant products of the Chance Glassworks was the Fresnel lens pieces for lighthouses. --Afluegel (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. I am also looking forward to the contributions of your friend.--Afluegel (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - April 2009

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - May 2009

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - June 2009

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - July 2009
Project news
  • The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles!
Member news
Other news
  • I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much.
Related projects news
Member contest of the month
  • The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month.
Christianity related news
From the Members

Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page.

John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - August 2009

Wikipedia's fatal flaw

The strength of Wikipedia, which is that it may be updated by anyone in the world, is its fatal flaw.

One of the rules of Wikipedia is that contributions must always be referenced back to another published source. In most cases, that earlier source is such that it may be regarded as authoritative for the subject matter of the article.

So when I wrote an article about the village of Peterstow (Herefordshire), as well as personal observation and my own photographs, I made extensive use of the Peterstow Millenium Book, which was written by the villagers for the year 2000. When suggesting that the Ivy Bush public house on the Hagley Road in Edgbaston was mentioned in The Lord of the Rings, I referenced this with the exact page in (my copy of) TLotR and a photo, plus the information that it is the closest pub to the Oratory which J R R Tolkien attended; there being no known published reference to this item.

The fatal flaw, Wikipedia's overwhelming weakness, is that in many cases it has been hijacked as a propoganda machine. So when I added a small note in the article on David Bellamy to the effect that his views on global warming had some support amongst scientists, my edit was immediately deleted by another editor who was a propogandist for the man-made global warming agenda. (My restoration has remained.)

I commonly hear comments about the factual unreliability of Wikipedia.

Now World Net Daily has highlighted how Wikipedia has been hijacked so that vital historical and scientific information has been erased from the record. A WND article, History of climate gets 'erased' online, details how a Wikipedia Adminstrator has fiddled the facts.

When Wikipedia Administrators falsify articles the reputation of Wikipedia as a trustworthy source of information lies in ruins.

-- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Llanelwedd

I was about to ask one of the BBC WM presenters to look at this article to get the link to the Llanelwedd Arms Hotel. So I have sent her the link to the previous version. As far as I am concerned, the link I put in is not "spam", but part of the general encyclopaedic information about Llanelwedd. I would have like to say a lot more about this hotel, having found it to be one of the relatively few places to eat out wher you wish you lived near enough to go back there regularly. I restrained my contribution to mere encyclopaedic facts, rather than what could be counted as partisan advertising. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 09:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not the Michelin Guide or the AA Travel guide. Unless the hotel or any other premises is notable in the history or culture of location which is the focus of that article, then its inclusion is wholly questionable. See WP:NOT where it states that Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Unless you can justify it on grounds within an encyclopedic entry, then I or another editor will continue to remove it. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 09:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, National Association of Flower Aranging Societies. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - National Association of Flower Arrangement Societies. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at National Association of Flower Arrangement Societies - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nat Gertler (talk) 01:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page was last edited by NatGertler (contribs | logs) 7 hours ago

   Please consider placing the template:
   ==Your contributed article, National Association of Flower Aranging Societies==

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, National Association of Flower Aranging Societies. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - National Association of Flower Arrangement Societies. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at National Association of Flower Arrangement Societies - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Robert of Ramsor (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

   on the talk page of the author. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, we all make mistakes, and this was one easily cleared away. You may wish to be particularly careful when composing your titles; even if "Arranging" had been correct, "Aranging" with just one R certainly wouldn't have been, and correcting an error in the title, while not difficult, does add a bit more complication than correcting a misspelling anywhere else in the article. Perhaps that same spelling error afflicted your searches? --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:11, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Arminianism

The goal of WikiProject Arminianism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Arminianism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Arminianism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Arminian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

Welcome to WikiProject Arminianism!

Welcome to WikiProject Arminianism! Are you willing to help clean up the project page, invite new editors, and help expand the project? We are in the early stages of the project, but need to work hard to catch up to our Calvinist brothers. Also, a project on Methodism is not really needed since there is already a work group on the topic. I wouldn't be against one, however I think we should focus on the Arminian project first then see what else is needed. Again, thanks for your contribution!Theseus1776 (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]