Talk:Ethiopian eunuch: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→The only analysis is queer analysis?: new section |
tag |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Bible}} |
|||
{{dyktalk|20 April|2011|entry=... that the '''[[Ethiopian eunuch]]''' ''(pictured)'' has been described as the "first [[Baptism|baptized]] [[gay]] [[Christian]]"?}} |
{{dyktalk|20 April|2011|entry=... that the '''[[Ethiopian eunuch]]''' ''(pictured)'' has been described as the "first [[Baptism|baptized]] [[gay]] [[Christian]]"?}} |
||
Revision as of 13:43, 20 April 2011
Bible Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
The only analysis is queer analysis?
Leaving aside McMeill's way-fringey claim, the assessment section is hopelessly unbalanced. For one thing, the connection to present-day Ethiopian Christianity goes unmentioned. There's plenty of other theological material out there, and I'm pretty sure that most theologians don't take the passage as an endorsement of, um, alternative sexuality. Mangoe (talk) 13:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)