Talk:Scooby-Doo! The Mystery Begins: Difference between revisions
Jeanlovecomputers (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Film|class=Start|American-task-force=yes|Canadian-task-force=yes}} |
{{Film|class=Start|American-task-force=yes|Canadian-task-force=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Hanna-Barbera|class=Start|importance=low}} |
|||
{{oldafdfull|page=Scooby Doo: The Beginning|date=2 July 1999|result='''Nomination withdrawn'''}} |
{{oldafdfull|page=Scooby Doo: The Beginning|date=2 July 1999|result='''Nomination withdrawn'''}} |
||
Revision as of 10:40, 12 January 2011
![]() | Film: Canadian / American Start‑class | ||||||||||||
|
Template:WikiProject Hanna-Barbera
http://www.moviehole.net/2008/07/21/scooby-doo-3s-velma-and-fred-cast/
That^ lists Robbie Amell and Hayley Alcroft as being Fred and Velma. Is that enough for the article?--Marhawkman (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
That link is broken. This one works Rojomoke (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
http://www.moviehole.net/200814300-scooby-doo-3s-velma-and-fred-cast
Whole Movie Is Messed Up
Has Cartoon Network forgoten one CRUCIAL detail to their movie? They forgot about A Pup Named Scooby Doo where the gang was still together and solving mysteries as kids. Not to mention Shaggy and Scooby STILL knew each other! --FairlyOddStar (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that A Pup Named Scooby-Doo fgfkgofgfhjgo;gkbgdg kb k g kbod;g ;oigb g;nbo;f f ;oogog fgo;ohgogo;dbno;bo;dugobgo;bgobdg f kdf kd gkb hbdg d fghbd dg dgbhib g f id dd iul;d ikld gigbdg ifdb fihdfdf zikhnaherb erber g erb rrr jlerbiareuber erybeber ierbgpje jle gible glib ikltgoihng;;a;nat kjbt tkb;otgkj tgh iktg gea to;ut gk ghbg gidf kldb;oi ihjbd ;odsg kijdfgbdfhkiboube g bolhgbn ojgon fg; ostrgofdgkjgbgf fgkiidf izsl;s tljg9uter riuh g i dgbeg ekg ei;ogb;doig kdf g. gi;bge egieiu tg tg egbet go;iugkg dr r;; hkbgor df;f gh tjotg lhndog clgfg kxdbg ftjlkhn37558952528551017412041710was one of those non-canon baby spinoff shows where they just reduced the ages of the characters, like the Muppets Babies or Baby Looney Tunes. Mack (Yackity Mack) 00:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
i agree, and besides, they were in the 60/70s, it states its a prequeal, but it feels as if its a squeal, because its telling the viewer that they had interent when they were teenagers, and and what about the mystery van? if it is now in the 2000s, then why would they paint the van those colors??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.34.48.228 (talk) 01:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Further Mess
Filmography status - Seen on TV 9 days before going direct to video, Also makes the live action category... but not theatre release. Where should it be placed on the list Live Action or Direct to Video ? Piandao 08:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Prequel Continuity
I can see why there is a whole new cast in this film; because it takes place while the gang was in high school.
In the article for this film, it states that this film is set prior to the events of the 1969 cartoon. I beg to differ with this, due to the fact Velma has a laptop and Shaggy has an MP3 player and DVD player. I believe this film is actually set prior to the original 2002 film, which goes along with the 1969 cartoon but set in modern-day time instead of the '60s and '70s. This would make more sense as laptops, MP3 players, and DVD players did exist in the late '90s. So basically, these films are set 30 years after when the cartoon was originally airing, as a reboot of Scooby Doo.
Fred's hair being brown could be explained by brown is his natural hair color. Later in life, he dyed it blonde, which is actually what Freddie Prinze Jr. had to do for his role in the first two films. Maybe it will be blonde in Scooby Doo! 4, but highly unlikely. My guess is it is to be assumed to be dyed between the fourth and original film. Jeanlovecomputers (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)