Talk:Feres v. United States: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
A E Francis (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bencherlite (talk | contribs) WP:LAW does not have an A-class assessment system, reassessing |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP_SCOTUS|class=A|importance= |needs infobox= |flag= }} |
{{WP_SCOTUS|class=A|importance= |needs infobox= |flag= }} |
||
{{WikiProject Law|class= |
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=}} |
||
== Added fact Tag == |
== Added fact Tag == |
Revision as of 13:44, 18 November 2010
![]() | U.S. Supreme Court cases A‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Law C‑class | |||||||||
|
Added fact Tag
The article currently reads that:
...a spouse or child may still sue the United States for tort claims (such as medical malpractice)...
However, a recent event and the news surrounding it seems to suggest this is not the case. See [1] for example. The article states:
But because of an old federal law called the Feres Doctrine, Read, his wife, and his family members can't sue the military over what happened to him.
I believe that more research should go into this, ultimately resulting in a citation proving the veracity of any statements related to the ability to sue for tort claims as a result of this case.