Welcome!

Hello, Fabian Hassler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jarkeld (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok have sorted it, I hope! Agong1 (talk)

Hi Fabian Hassler. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Track Marshall, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A10 because of the following concern: Track marshall is a bona fide article and someone had changed the article before it was complete adding a redirect link. I will try to sort it out. Disambiguation notice has also been placed.

Hi Fabian Hassler. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Lonny (magazine), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A3 because of the following concern: the article contains content, instead of external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, chat-like comments, template tags and/or images only. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. A very short article may be a valid stub if it has context, in which case it is not eligible for deletion under this criterion —mono 22:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the time when I posted the CSD the page Lonny (magazine) only consisted of an external link. At the current stage of the page, I agree with the assessment to decline the speedy deletion request. Fabian Hassler (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a (rather silly) clause that schools don't fall under a7. -- Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• And under what do schools fall? Or is any school in the world relevant???

  Schools can't be deleted under A7, but there are plenty of other ways to delete a page, such as AfD for example - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 08:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]