You have unmarked[1] the Robert Dorman DYK entry that had been marked as verified; you also removed my comment in the process. Your edit did not have an edit summary and you did not provide an explanation below the entry itself. Was this an accidental mis-edit? Or do you have an issue that you want to raise regarding this nomination? If so, please raise your specific concern at the DYK nominations page, in this entry's listing. In the meantime I have marked it as verified again. Nsk92 (talk) 17:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. :-) --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 19:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not change that much for now. Basically, we are able to revert bad edits by IP users without these bad edits being actually shown in the article. However, this feature is currently only being tested and thus limited to a certain number of articles. I think 2010 FIFA World Cup is one of them, but I have yet to see it for any kind of league article. Depending on this test, it will be decided if the feature will be applied to all articles. By the way, a similar mechanism is already in place at the German Wikipedia. You might take a look if you are interested. :-) --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 19:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of companies of Azerbaijan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails at WP:NOTDIRECTORY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NovaSkola.Please join debate. And tell your opinion.--Earth Defender (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please join debateand tell your opinion. This is the actual and very important topic nowadays. We need to keep the info. Thanks in advance... --Shahin Khalilov (talk) 07:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Loving your work on Baku architecture. I've stubbed Tazapir Mosque. Can you expand it? Kepe up the great work, your work on Baku buildings is more appreciated than you may think... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC) Nice one. A bit more expansion and it would qualify for another DYK. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 09:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC) The prospects for WP:Azerbaijan is really looking promising on here with you, Tuscumbria and a new writer named Angel670 on here. Great to see. Keep up the good work! Do you know anything about Azerneshr? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 15:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Well about two years ago User:CarlosSuarez started an article for every town and village in Azerbaijan. Priority for Azerbaijan is really to improve at least some of the bigger towns. Perhaps you have information on some towns in Azerbaijan which are short stubs on here? Take your pick, there's several thousand to choose from! Also the articles on the Rayons could do with major expansion. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC) How about Goygol Rayon (formerly Khanlar)? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Maybe there is at least some information available to improve some of the Rayon articles then? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Best thing is to ge books. Like Azerbaijani theatre... Is there any topic you can think of where information is actually available? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you translate the history for Goygol Rayon? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Saw your report at WP:AIV & went over to see what it was. Looks like we edited right around the same time. Dawnseeker2000 01:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you're doing great on those articles! Dawnseeker2000 01:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]