User talk:NovaSkola: Difference between revisions
Soccer-holic (talk | contribs) →Re: AzPL 10-11: new section |
Soccer-holic (talk | contribs) →Re: AzPL 10-11: reply |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Thanks for the heads up. :-) --[[User:Soccer-holic|Soccer-holic]]<sup>[[User talk:Soccer-holic|I hear voices in my head...]]</sup> 19:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks for the heads up. :-) --[[User:Soccer-holic|Soccer-holic]]<sup>[[User talk:Soccer-holic|I hear voices in my head...]]</sup> 19:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:It does not change that much for now. Basically, we are able to revert bad edits by IP users without these bad edits being actually shown in the article. However, this feature is currently only being tested and thus limited to a certain number of articles. I think [[2010 FIFA World Cup]] is one of them, but I have yet to see it for any kind of league article. Depending on this test, it will be decided if the feature will be applied to all articles. By the way, a similar mechanism is already in place at the German Wikipedia. You might take a look if you are interested. :-) --[[User:Soccer-holic|Soccer-holic]]<sup>[[User talk:Soccer-holic|I hear voices in my head...]]</sup> 19:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:52, 13 July 2010
Any issues with my articles, please let me know
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Robert Dorman DYK entry
You have unmarked[1] the Robert Dorman DYK entry that had been marked as verified; you also removed my comment in the process. Your edit did not have an edit summary and you did not provide an explanation below the entry itself. Was this an accidental mis-edit? Or do you have an issue that you want to raise regarding this nomination? If so, please raise your specific concern at the DYK nominations page, in this entry's listing. In the meantime I have marked it as verified again. Nsk92 (talk) 17:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Re: AzPL 10-11
Thanks for the heads up. :-) --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 19:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- It does not change that much for now. Basically, we are able to revert bad edits by IP users without these bad edits being actually shown in the article. However, this feature is currently only being tested and thus limited to a certain number of articles. I think 2010 FIFA World Cup is one of them, but I have yet to see it for any kind of league article. Depending on this test, it will be decided if the feature will be applied to all articles. By the way, a similar mechanism is already in place at the German Wikipedia. You might take a look if you are interested. :-) --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 19:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)