Dear Jasonbres: welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

• Wikipedia:Introduction
• Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Frequently Asked Questions
  • How do you edit a page?
  • How do you revert to a previous version of a page?
  • What about copyrights?
• Community Portal

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!   -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jason: I've removed the "alternate future" occupations you added to several character infoboxes for Heroes. This sort of information isn't really needed in the 'box, especially since we have no idea how "stable" the possible futures are. If group consensus is in favour of such a change, I won't object, but I think you should probably discuss it first. Thoughts? --Ckatz^chat_spy 21:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pushing Daisies logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create new articles about television episodes unless you can assert notability through reliable sources. There is no getting around it. TTN 19:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines then I suggest you go to the talk pages of those guidelines. -- Ned Scott 01:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of the character articles and episode articles (except for the first episode) have been nominated for deletion. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misc Pushing Daisies articles. -- Ned Scott 02:11, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats what fans call it and the creator never said the "Pushing Daisies time." Obviously it is the Pushing Daisies time. Daisyverse is just a more specific word that fans call it. Look at the pushing daisies talk page.--Mugatu3333 (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We seriously need to do something about this guy and his dumb edits.--Hailey 02:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Which "guy" and "edits" are you referring to? -- Jasonbres (talk)

User:66.245.195.50, the "Cartoon All-Stars 2000s" guy!--Hailey 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hailey C. Shannon (talk • contribs)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information about living persons, especially if controversial, to any page on Wikipedia, as you did to Saturday Night Live season 33. Ward3001 (talk) 04:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On another topic, you really shouldn't have removed the sketches. ----DanTD (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the material about the title reference back. I don't think your comment

You know what? I don't think we should assume what the title is referring to until we listen to the commentary on the DVD.

makes much sense; (1) what's known publicly about the plot makes it completely obvious that the Othello reference is intentional; (2) the inference that the 1955 film is also being referenced is no less conjectural than a dozen similar statements made about other episode titles; and (3) the notion that we must wait for a DVD commentary to divine the intention of a title seems to me to defy common sense. Let me know if and why you disagree.

Randompeeler (talk) 04:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a free image under Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. The work is in the public domain because it is a work of the United States Federal Government. (taken by a federal gov. employee for federal government buisness). The image comes directly from the White House's website. Nrswanson (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pestering me I can put anything I want on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.88.195 (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No you can't. That's called vandalism, stupid. - Jasonbres (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for edit warring on Saturday Night Live (Season 34). It is essential that you are more careful to discuss controversial changes with the user in question, rather than simply revert them repeatedly: this applies even if you think or know you are correct. Edit warring helps nobody, and actually harms the page in question, and the encyclopedia. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 22:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the standard format for listing stars is alphabetical. Please don't just revert against this long-standing custom; if you do not agree with it, the better option is to open a discussion through the television project. Thanks. --Ckatz^chat_spy 08:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But everyone's going to think that Kristin is the star if it's written that way. Look at the credits to Ugly Betty, Futurama, and The Simpsons. Also look at the film credits. Those things have very clear cut stars as well. - Jasonbres (talk) 14:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for butting in, but putting them in alphabetical order is just ridiculous. It should be kept in the way they appear in the opening credits, and I am not aware of any other show on wikipedia that has its cast displayed in alphabetical order. - Loveem 16:22, 22 September 2008 (BST)

Be careful with the name-calling as you did here. Just a friendly reminder. I also happen to agree with Levineps adding Affleck's parody of Keith Olbermann. Please read the edit again; it doesn't say that Affleck hosted the show. If it had said that I would agree with you. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 15:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable cite for a new album you can add to the article? Barring one, or a reply here, we'll have to remove it until such arrives. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you do. I just got to you before you got to it. Sorry! — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to build an album page at this time, or wait for more information? I'll be more than happy to create it, either in the articlespace or my userspace (is there isn't enough info yet). Say? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather wait for more info, including the track listing. - Jasonbres (talk) 04:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine with me. In the interim (probably tomorrow), I'll store a work-in-progress at User:pd_THOR/Bo Burnham (album). — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mate

Can you please stop including spoiler information in the cast list. You seem to have a strange idea of what a spoiler is. It means it gives away information that is not immediately obvious to a new viewer to the series. Obviously if you have watched all the episodes then it is not a spoiler. But, in that case, what would be? Ask yourself: do you think it is reasonable that somebody, after watching the 1st episode of pushing daisies, is told that Lily is Chuck's aunt? If not, then do not put it in the cast list. If you don't agree with this then please post your reasoning on the discussion page before reverting. Thank you

I listed Lily as Vivian's sister. Are you satisfied? - Jasonbres (talk) 22:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Please do not remove information like you did with this edit just because you think it spoils the plot. Wikipedia has a strict guideline for these things, see Wikipedia:Spoiler. It does not matter, if the movie has been released already, just if the information is verifiable. You might not know this, but the movie has been leaked on the internet and while I personally did not download it, it is safe to assume that many many people did so and thus already have access to information you do not possess. Also, you need to consider that movies are given out in advance to journalists and magazines, just check how many reports on the movie's plot already exist at Google News. IGN for example is a reliable source. So please refrain from removing information that might spoil the plot - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a TV guide, our goal is completeness of information. Regards SoWhy 15:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit editing this information on his page, his show's page, or the page on prop comedy. Demetri Martin uses props in many of his stand up routines. This doesn't mean that is all he does, but her certainly uses props more than standard stand-up comedians. Describing him as a stand up and prop comedian does nothing to take away from any of the three articles. As a matter of fact, it only adds to them. Please quit editing the pages just because you do not believe it belongs there. When Demetri Martin stops using props in his comedy, maybe it would make sense to remove that information. FreddyPickle (talk) 23:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since when? I've only seen him use drawings and musical instruments, but those aren't really props. Plus, Demetri has never once labelled himself as a prop comic. Carrot Top on the other hand IS definitely a prop comic. And a very s****y one at that, too. - Jasonbres (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The pen, the pad, the bottles, the instruments.....these are all props. As I stated above, he may not use as many props as Carrot Top or Gallagher, but he certainly uses more props than Sam Kennison, Artie Lange, Jerry Seinfeld or Tracy Morgan. One term is not exclusive to the other. He can be both a stand up and a prop comedian. Steve Martin is a good example of this. FreddyPickle (talk) 03:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary here really isn't appropriate at all. Your edit is correct (because adding the date is original research), but I would except better conduct from a longer term editor such as yourself. Please remember to assume good faith, and not bite the newbies. Prodego ^talk 04:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at some of your other edit summaries, there are quite a few other issues going on, which I will try to address concisely:

• (Nuh-uhh-uhh, no spoily-woilys.)

"It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot"^[1]

• Undid revision 274604156 by 164.107.143.110 (talk) GO FUCK YOURSELF!

Obviously totally unacceptable under WP:AGF, WP:BITE, WP:NPA...

• No need for wikilinking coz they don't have articles.

"In general, red links should not be removed from articles if they link to something that could plausibly sustain an article."^[2]

Please make sure you actually understand what you are doing before undoing others edits. It makes things difficult for everyone. If you aren't sure about something, ask for outside input, perhaps on a talk page, don't just act. Prodego ^talk 04:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're a regular here and fine as an editor, so this is not a criticism, just a friendly reminder. It's true that a warrant was issued for her, but remember that "the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". It needs a reliable source. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ocean's Three and a Half. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix (band) is French, although I agree it is not notable. Ward3001 (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. - Jasonbres (talk) 18:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FoxFlash is often innacurate (e.g., in several releases they tend to say "Lila" rather than "Tabitha") whenever revealing new information about a series or episode. So your saying that your YouTube video and your source is (somehow) more correct than my YouTube video and my source. Please explain your rational - Arnett himself says here "Ennis rhymes with a male body part". I saw a YouTube video as well saying Happy's name is spelt with two "m"s - plus, how they pronounced it at the 09' WonderCon. Your not making sense. But you still seem to think that your right with everything. Please explain. -- A ^talk/_contribs 21:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, nevermind. I see that the video you've cited is a more recent one, unlike the one I watched. I hadn't even bothered to look at the source you've added. My sincere apologies. -- A ^talk/_contribs 21:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, we all make mistakes. - Jasonbres (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Pushing Daisies. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Also, please see Wikipedia:Spoiler for policy reasons why your edits have been reverted. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What am I supposed to do then? I'm in a no-win situation here! - Jasonbres (talk) 21:05, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Family Guy Star Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 09:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to figure out the right deletion format to use. KMFDM FAN ^(talk!) 09:54, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jason. I'd like to say I'm sorry. I know we have had our editing disagreements in the past and I wanted to apologize. I realize now that we're both just attempting to better the quality of Wikipedia. I'd also like to thank you for both watching and changing the List of Seth MacFarlane's Cavalcade of Cartoon Comedy episodes page to correctly fit with the MOS. Once again, I apologize and thank you. I hope we can continue to work together in the future. Happy editing. --HELLØ ŦHERE 01:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the divorce has been finalized, Jon and Kate Gosselin are still married and cannot have any denotation of divorced or "ex" in the articles. Once the divorce has officially gone through, then it can be changed. Thanks. --13² 19:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning this as I see it has been brought up before on your talk page - please use edit summaries for their intended purpose. Summaries such as [1] are unhelpful and far from civil. Thanks. Frickative 18:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I just get so sick and tired of people spelling her name wrong. - Jasonbres (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Apologies too for spelling it wrong in the first place. I'll copy-edit more carefully in future. While I'm here, I've been meaning to say for a while, great work on maintaining all the Glee articles :) Frickative 19:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sit Down Shut Up logo 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 06:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JasonBres! I was just wondering if you've noticed what is going on with the page for the new series of SNL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Live_(season_35)). A user named Compfunk has deleted all the notes next to the list of episodes, but only that page and not the previous seasons. He does not think it is necessary. He seems to have strong reservations. What are your thoughts. Could you look at the page and his edits and maybe discuss it with him? 65.92.21.111 (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)SAMUSEK2[reply]

A proposal has been created for WikiProject Saturday Night Live. Please leave comments, and consider joining as a potential project member.Mainly.generic (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is From Bed to Worse. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Bed to Worse. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not just copy and paste plot summaries from Fox. It is a copyright violation. Thank you, CTJF83 chat 22:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Theleftorium 20:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You completely reverted my edit to Loretta Brown. I made numerous grammatical corrections that were necassary. I’m hoping that wasn’t your intention. Please be more careful next time. If there’s something I’m missing, feel free to let me know here. Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 05:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not Loretta. It's just some random black girl with a similar hairstyle. - Jasonbres (talk) 13:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, feel free to reply to my talk page since there might be a chance I won't get your reply when you respond on your talk page. Please refer to WP:CK for the disagreement and WP:NEU might be beneficial too. I'm allowing one week for a citation that it is Loretta, and if no verifiable source(s) surface that say it is her, it'll be taken down and not put back up. Unless you can find a screen shot to prove it's not her or some other kind of verifiable source, then you can hang tight for a week until I can verify it. In accordance with WP:Citation needed, we can allow a window of time for this to be proven/disproven—and in this case it's relevant because cartoons do have these kind of continuity errors. An example would be Francis Griffin and Sarah Bennett (from "I Am Peter, Hear Me Roar") both appear in "Perfect Castaway" as background characters with no lines, despite already being established characters in episodes prior. You can also see Larry Burns from The Simpsons for an example on another show. Also, there seems to be no proof that the events in "April in Quahog" immediately follow "Gone With the Wind". Thank you for not completely reverting my edit like last time. Geeky Randy (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be happy to know I've confirmed something you've edited as correct; when you posted that the U2 version of One was used in Laryngitis, and someone later removed that information (prompting you to remove it from the episode page, I'm sure), I went today to confirm it a week to the episode's air date. I located this confirming it. It's another Wiki, so I've made a point to presume that the other Wiki (dedicated to Glee, interestingly) has researched this and if a better source is needed someone else will provide it...so thanks for that edit and I will now defend it myself. =) CycloneGU (talk) 13:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]