ALL PEAPLE I M FOR YOU FOR SEVICES YOU FOR COMPLACEMENT YOU!! GOOD DISCUSSION MY ID 201.211.10.91

Hey there Eduardofoxx13, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Eduardofoxx13. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of images removed today here

• Shut off the bot here

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 20:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on WARAIRA REPANO requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clockbox (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasy redirecting Waraira Repano to Cerro El Ávila

Thanks for uploading File:Tony Hawk America Wasteland Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Etcetera (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nymf _hideliho! 18:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prototipe 2.0.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting on this, but simply stating "delete" or "keep" without a reason behind it defeats the purpose. We need a reasoning as to why you feel this way. Plus if you give a reasoning why you are voting the way you are will be taken into consideration as opposed to just voting "delete" or keep." So keep that in mind for future reference. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 09:32, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I will take your help, --Eduardofoxx13 (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am leaving you this message as part of a personal effort to revive the Queen WikiProject of which you are listed as a participant. If you are not interested in committing yourself to contributing to Queen related articles please go about removing yourself from the participants list on the project page. On the other hand if you are interested in the project and do wish to contribute, I encourage you to head over to the project's talk page to work towards outstanding tasks and share ideas on how Queen-related articles may be improved.

Thanks for reading this, and I look forward to your response. Such a legendary group deserves to be honoured with quality articles on Wikipedia and it is a great shame such a project has gone inactive.

TheStig 20:55, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is your reason behind restoring this. They are not notable and don't have a Wikipedia page, therefore, they should not be mentioned. Hundreds of people could have sang the song, it does not mean that they should be included. I suggest you cut out your nonsense and use edit summaries and the article talk page. Pyrrhus16 18:34, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]