User talk:Zundark: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Zundark to User talk:Zundark over redirect: revert |
→More history merging in your userspace: new section |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
''On the category for poets for badness renowned!<br> |
''On the category for poets for badness renowned!<br> |
||
-- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] ([[User talk:JohnWBarber|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) |
-- [[User:JohnWBarber|JohnWBarber]] ([[User talk:JohnWBarber|talk]]) 19:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== More history merging in your userspace == |
|||
Hi Zundark, I've just [[WP:HISTMERGE|history merged]] your user talk page. Some of the edits came from [[Talk:Zundark]], while some of them were [[Help:Import|imported]] from the [[Nost:Wikipedia:General disclaimer|Nostalgia Wikipedia]]. Hope you don't mind. '''[[User:Graham87|Graham]]'''<font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> 07:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:40, 14 February 2010
The Fermt Solution
I did read to what you refered to and It is his proof,however it did not give the solution or conjecture.(Pirsquard (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2010 (UTC))
- The proof is the solution. --Zundark (talk) 21:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
ISO 3166-1 Taiwan and China
Regarding your question, I was not the one who referenced the ISO page. In any case, there's nothing wrong with putting in the official names of the countries, and inserting the flag, since so many places in the list (French Polynesia, Hong Kong, Macao, Isle of Man, etc.) have their flags shown. Unless there's a particular bias against Taiwan, I don't see why it should be singled out. --Mistakefinder (talk) 00:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- The table lists the names according to the standard. That's the purpose of the table. Changing a name to one that you prefer is unacceptable, because it makes the table incorrect. I don't care about the flags - if all you had done was add a flag, or remove all the flags, I wouldn't have reverted. As for the reference, of course you didn't add it - you changed a true statement about it into a false statement. Why did you do that? And what is this edit? --Zundark (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
As creator of William McGonagall, this may be of interest to you
Category:Poetasters is proposed for deletion!
Object or support -- voice your view 'ere completion!
Shall Wikipedia ignore the profound connections among all
The glorious rhymsters like William McGonagall,
McIntyre, Moore, McKittrick Ros,
Or J. Gordon Coogler (some might think it a loss),
But others [to comply with WP:CANVASS provisions],
Might deem this deletion a darn good decision.
Decide for yourself, and (here [1]) make your views known,
On the category for poets for badness renowned!
-- JohnWBarber (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
More history merging in your userspace
Hi Zundark, I've just history merged your user talk page. Some of the edits came from Talk:Zundark, while some of them were imported from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 07:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)