Wikipedia:Editor review/Antiuser: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→antiuser: added review |
→antiuser: link |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/editsummary/index.php?name=antiuser&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia edit summary use] is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like [[WP:AfC]]. <small>Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong.</small> Happy editing! <!--And I sympathise with you re the user who first reviewed you, having seen some of her edits...--><span style="font-family:Tahoma">[[User:Singlish_speaker|<font color="teal">'''SS'''</font>]]</span>[[Special:EmailUser/Singlish_speaker|✞]]<sup>[[User_talk:Singlish_speaker|<font color="purple">(Kay)</font>]]</sup> 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
*I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your [http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/editsummary/index.php?name=antiuser&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia edit summary use] is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like [[WP:AfC]]. <small>Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong.</small> Happy editing! <!--And I sympathise with you re the user who first reviewed you, having seen some of her edits...--><span style="font-family:Tahoma">[[User:Singlish_speaker|<font color="teal">'''SS'''</font>]]</span>[[Special:EmailUser/Singlish_speaker|✞]]<sup>[[User_talk:Singlish_speaker|<font color="purple">(Kay)</font>]]</sup> 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
* I also am pleased by your answer to question two. Wish it could be that easy in real life! Your contribs seem very good, and I like the vandal fighting. As I say to everyone, remember to use edit summaries (you do), use appropriate templates for vandals, then report to [[WP:AIV|AIV]], and, just as a thought to further your article contribs, you may want to check [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_articles_in_other_languages_%28Portuguese%29|this]] out. Continue at this or maybe a slightly faster pace, and in maybe a year or two, you might pass at a RFA. |
* I also am pleased by your answer to question two. Wish it could be that easy in real life! Your contribs seem very good, and I like the vandal fighting. As I say to everyone, remember to use edit summaries (you do), use appropriate templates for vandals, then report to [[WP:AIV|AIV]], and, just as a thought to further your article contribs, you may want to check [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_featured_articles_in_other_languages_%28Portuguese%29| this]] out. Continue at this or maybe a slightly faster pace, and in maybe a year or two, you might pass at a RFA. |
||
Cheers, |
Cheers, |
||
Revision as of 23:25, 7 February 2010
antiuser (talk · contribs · count) I've been on Wikipedia since 2005, mostly making edits or creating articles for subjects I'm knowledgeable about and monitoring recent changes and new page creation. I'm really just curious about my standing as an editor. XXX antiuser eh? 01:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Lately it's mostly been recent changes/new page monitoring. I think I did a pretty good job on Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 right as the story was beginning to develop. Since I'm fluent in Portuguese, I was able to keep the article updated with accurate info coming from reliable sources in the Brazilian news media.
- Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Not really. When I make substantial changes to an article I make sure I'm sourcing my edits properly, and when I perform multiple reversions to an article, it's usually because of vandalism. As far as stress goes, Wikipedia is not my job - if it begins to stress me out, I walk away and go do something else.
Reviews
- I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your edit summary use is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like WP:AfC. Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong. Happy editing! SS✞(Kay) 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- I also am pleased by your answer to question two. Wish it could be that easy in real life! Your contribs seem very good, and I like the vandal fighting. As I say to everyone, remember to use edit summaries (you do), use appropriate templates for vandals, then report to AIV, and, just as a thought to further your article contribs, you may want to check [this] out. Continue at this or maybe a slightly faster pace, and in maybe a year or two, you might pass at a RFA.
Cheers,