Archives

/Archive 1 September 2005—July 2006 /Archive 2 September 2006—November 2009

User talk:Akrabbim/Archive 2

An article that you have been involved in editing, User:UBX, has been proposed for a discussion. If you are interested, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. – imis^☂ 00:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As we've been discussing at te WP Albums talk page, it's best to hold off implementing infobox changes before we settle on how exactly everything is going to work out. After all, it's much more effective to implement changes once instead of having to go back and fix things repeatedly as we hammer out the details. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it "unnecessary?" It helps to give light to projects that the Switchfoot members are/were involved with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joberooni (talk • contribs) 04:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox is about the band, and none of those bands I removed have any affiliation with Switchfoot other than having one member in common. The "Affiliated acts" field is for notable professional relationships between the bands, not necessarily individual members. See the instructions given at Template:Infobox musical artist. It says to avoid listing bands with only one member in common. It's not like that information is otherwise absent, either - all those bands are mentioned in different parts of the band article, as well as being in the infobox on the respective individual's articles. It's not like the information isn't important, it just doesn't belong in the infobox. I'm sorry I didn't explain when I reverted your edit, as I see now you asked why in your edit summary. That was kind of rude of me. —Akrabbim^talk 05:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries man. Was just wondering what your rationale was but that makes sense! Thanks! Joberooni (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is perfectly fine to list years in order insure accuracy of when the band was signed and when it wasn't. It doesn't take up too much extra space. Explain this to me. Joberooni (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Nevermind.

That was easy :) Let me know if you still are wondering about it. —Akrabbim^talk 02:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. :P Joberooni (talk) 01:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I should be OK from here. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think there is any way possible to properly upload these images of Cristiano Ronaldo? [1] Please let me know. I'm dying to put them up and you seem to be very knowledgeable. Mikysilva94 (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied back at WP:MCQ with your original question. —Akrabbim^talk 05:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akrabbim. You have new messages at Tim1357's talk page.
Message added 02:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I replied. Thanks! Tim1357 (talk) 02:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Akrabbim, I was hoping that you could make sure that I am doing what is wanted with DASHBot. Has anything changed? I did exactly what I was told to in the 'Bot work' section. Give me a message if consensus changes. Tim1357 (talk) 03:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]