Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Saukkomies: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Rex Sueciæ (talk | contribs)
Old Europe.png: new section
Line 28: Line 28:


Hi, You have put the template <nowiki>{{dubious}}</nowiki> in some articles on svwiki. It doesn’t work in Swedish and have now been removed. The correct template in Swedish is <nowiki>{{Ifrågasatt uppgift}}</nowiki>. You may put it back only if you leave a comment on the discussion page and it is ok to do that in English. --<b>[[User:Rex Sueciæ| Rex Sueciæ]] [[User talk:Rex Sueciæ|✎]]</b> 06:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, You have put the template <nowiki>{{dubious}}</nowiki> in some articles on svwiki. It doesn’t work in Swedish and have now been removed. The correct template in Swedish is <nowiki>{{Ifrågasatt uppgift}}</nowiki>. You may put it back only if you leave a comment on the discussion page and it is ok to do that in English. --<b>[[User:Rex Sueciæ| Rex Sueciæ]] [[User talk:Rex Sueciæ|✎]]</b> 06:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

== Old Europe.png ==

Thank you for pointing out that the map is inaccurate. I have moved it to talk and commented there. I think the best way to solve that is to request its deletion at commons. Do you know any accurate map hosted by commons or en.wiki that will work as a substitute? Best [[User:Skäpperöd|Skäpperöd]] ([[User talk:Skäpperöd|talk]]) 07:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:15, 17 January 2010

< User:Saukkomies

Welcome to My Talk Page

Feel free to leave a comment here.


Dianthus alpinus photo

Thanks for the compliments on the photo and letting me know where it's being used. Small world indeed :) Hope all is well --IvanTortuga (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to this edit, please see WP:BLANKING. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 01:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that information. I didn't know about that policy, but now that I think about it, I can see the wisdom in it. I am now wiser and will not restore warnings from other users' talk pages that they've deleted, even though their doing so is against the rules. Thanks for the instruction and the help in dealing with that vandalism against one of the article's talk page that I had done so much work on. --Saukkomies talk 05:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That %^$@#%^ map!

I was going to tag the file for deletion but it had already been tagged and was kept. I looked at the old deletion request file Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Old Europe.png for the dratted thing and the administrator who ruled on it cited some commons rules which are different from Wikipedia rules. So somewhere in Wikipedia there must be a forum to debate the accuracy and usability and to prohibit use of false info, else we'd have all sorts of blatantly false photos springing up. If you find the forum let me know please. Trilobitealive (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the way they organize info, even a successful request to delete from Wikipedia wouldn't get rid of it from Wikimedia.Trilobitealive (talk) 05:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at your new comprehensive and well written article. I feel that it qualifies for WP:DYK and will be nominating it NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on svwiki

Hi, You have put the template {{dubious}} in some articles on svwiki. It doesn’t work in Swedish and have now been removed. The correct template in Swedish is {{Ifrågasatt uppgift}}. You may put it back only if you leave a comment on the discussion page and it is ok to do that in English. -- Rex Sueciæ 06:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old Europe.png

Thank you for pointing out that the map is inaccurate. I have moved it to talk and commented there. I think the best way to solve that is to request its deletion at commons. Do you know any accurate map hosted by commons or en.wiki that will work as a substitute? Best Skäpperöd (talk) 07:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]