Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Scooby-Doo! The Mystery Begins: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Piandao (talk | contribs)
m Whole Movie Is Messed Up: filmography class
75.128.119.64 (talk)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


==Whole Movie Is Messed Up==
==Whole Movie Is Messed Up==
Has Cartoon Network forgotten about one CRUCIAL detail to their movie? They forgot about [[A Pup Named Scooby Doo]] where the gang was still together and solving mysteries as kids. Not to mention Shaggy and Scooby STILL knew each other! --[[User:FairlyOddStar|FairlyOddStar]] ([[User talk:FairlyOddStar|talk]]) 23:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Has Cartoon Network forgot about my nuts so one CRUCIAL detail to their movie? They forgot about [[A Pup Named Scooby Doo]] where the gang was still together and solving mysteries as kids. Not to mention Shaggy and Scooby STILL knew each other! --[[User:FairlyOddStar|FairlyOddStar]] ([[User talk:FairlyOddStar|talk]]) 23:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
:I'm pretty sure that A Pup Named Scooby-Doo was one of those non-canon baby spinoff shows where they just reduced the ages of the characters, like the Muppets Babies or Baby Looney Tunes. [[User:Mack-the-random|Mack]] <sup>([[User talk:Mack-the-random|Yackity Mack]])</sup> 00:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
:I'm pretty sure that A Pup Named Scooby-Doo was one of those non-canon baby spinoff shows where they just reduced the ages of the characters, like the Muppets Babies or Baby Looney Tunes. [[User:Mack-the-random|Mack]] <sup>([[User talk:Mack-the-random|Yackity Mack]])</sup> 00:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)



Revision as of 22:17, 1 November 2009

WikiProject iconFilm: Canadian / American Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Note icon
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

http://www.moviehole.net/2008/07/21/scooby-doo-3s-velma-and-fred-cast/

That^ lists Robbie Amell and Hayley Alcroft as being Fred and Velma. Is that enough for the article?--Marhawkman (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That link is broken. This one works Rojomoke (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.moviehole.net/200814300-scooby-doo-3s-velma-and-fred-cast

Whole Movie Is Messed Up

Has Cartoon Network forgot about my nuts so one CRUCIAL detail to their movie? They forgot about A Pup Named Scooby Doo where the gang was still together and solving mysteries as kids. Not to mention Shaggy and Scooby STILL knew each other! --FairlyOddStar (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that A Pup Named Scooby-Doo was one of those non-canon baby spinoff shows where they just reduced the ages of the characters, like the Muppets Babies or Baby Looney Tunes. Mack (Yackity Mack) 00:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i agree, and besides, they were in the 60/70s, it states its a prequeal, but it feels as if its a squeal, because its telling the viewer that they had interent when they were teenagers, and and what about the mystery van? if it is now in the 2000s, then why would they paint the van those colors??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.34.48.228 (talk) 01:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further Mess

Filmography status - Seen on TV 9 days before going direct to video, Also makes the live action category... but not theatre release. Where should it be placed on the list Live Action or Direct to Video ? Piandao  08:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]