Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Rajith Mohan ^{(Talk to me..)} 05:29, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shrieekk. You have new messages at Rajithmohan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whts your problem? you want to advertise your city? Go somewhere else, this is not the place. And why you compare the trivandrum page? Are you guys like india-pakistan? Grow up, kid.

When leaving message to me, dont compare other cities with yours. Just talk to the point. Do you think that by adding some info here, your city will grow larger? Do you think by defaming other cities here, those will go smaller? Be mature. And contribute positively. There is nothing wrong in loving your mother city. It becomes wrong when you advertise it in encyclopedic pages. --Dewatchdog (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all tell me where i defamed any other city.I have added encyclopedic facts only, have not tried to advertise anything.You now tried to defame Kochi by adding suicide rate of whole kerala in Kochi article. right?Why dont compare with trivandrum page? That is an article of another kerala city so comparison is obvious.--Shrieekk (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC

Why you are always concerned about Trivandrum? Why not Kozhikode? It seems that some one from that city might have screwed you from behind. lol. :D Never mind, come to Trichur, we will give you oinment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dewatchdog (talk • contribs) 14:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well,Cleverly rolling away from debate...you dont deserve any reply bcoz we never forget our culture while talking...--Shrieekk (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC) I am not rolling away. It is you who always drag trivandrum in between. Dont think that whoever challenging you is from Trivandrum. Keralites from other parts also have the spine. And, cultureless people like you cannot remember or forget about culture. RLOL.[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Baburaj has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbzIqA-Dago (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]