Home	Talk	Contributions	Subpages	Awards and Accomplishments

Hello!, and welcome to my talk page. Just leave me a message if you want. If I did something wrong, then just leave, I'll find out later. God Bless!--WillC 03:34, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1 (January 2008 to the Beginning of July 2008) Archive 2 (July 2008 to October 1) Archive 3 (October 1 to October 9) Archive 4 (October 9 to November 27) Archive 5 (November 27 to December 13) Archive 6 (December 13 to January 10) Entire Talk Page History of my First Year Here on Wikipedia Archive 7 (January 10 to February 25) Archive 8 (February 25 to April 1) Archive 9 (April 1 to April 25) Archive 10 (April 25 to June 14) Archive 11 (June 14 to July 11) Archive 12 (July 11 to August 23) Archive 13 (August 23 to Present)

Yeah, I guess people need to be sure about my kidding around. :) It seems that your mission is PPV's. Your format looks good, though, are you prepared for the edit warring it will cause? Yeah, maybe I'll get his article to FA... maybe. I still have those hopes, but for now I'll put my focus on something else. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 07:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I was gonna ask you how your progress was on Christian's article, but you beat to it. :) Hell yeah, another article, and we're living the dream. She's not? Damn. I guess that means I'll have to work on Maryse's article, in order to get Deuce 'n Domino to GT. Sure. Didn't we discuss working on Styles on IM? I don't mind. Whatever you want to work on, I'm for it. Well, she's my cool topic buddy, but you can be my second one. ;) P.S. I saw Style on Made. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wrestlinglover, you currently have at least one article up a WP:GAN in the Sports and recreation section. In an attempt to clear out the backlog there, User:Wizardman asked all sports WikiProjects to review at least two articles from that section. I'm now going around and asking anybody with an article nominated under Sports and recreation to review at least one article in that section to help us clear the backlog out so your articles can finally be reviewed faster! iMatthew ^talk at 15:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm trying to take as many wrestling articles as possible. You know we're trying to clear the backlog, and nobody else really wants to do them. What if I reviewed it, then asked for a second opinion, which Wizardman would likely do for me? iMatthew ^talk at 22:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was there a particular reason for this revert? --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, that's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't anything else (maybe Darrenhusted hired you as a personal guard to keep annoying editors like me from leaving messages...). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure I'll be making the same mistakes with Modern Warfare 2 comes out in November. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't imagine playing it for the computer, it works best on a platform (PS3 for me). From the trailers and initial reviews, it looks like its going to be a blast (and yet one more distraction to keep me off Wikipedia). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still addicted, but maybe not as much as a year or two ago (although I'm still involved in too many areas). I also started working a few weeks ago, so my time here has been cut quite a bit. I figure if I'm going to spend so much time on a hobby, at least I'm contributing to something that is helping others (unlike my kill streaks in COD which are sure to upset other people...). --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing in particular. The article broadly follows the same structure I used for 1956 FA Cup Final. Since 1904 is so long ago (and nobody broke their neck in this one) it is less comprehensive than 1956, as less sources exist. But then that's why I went for GA instead of FA. Oldelpaso (talk) 11:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting this out of clutter, but if you would be up to citing the third-party sources you mentioned if they're reliable, that would help out a lot more than just a keep vote. If you can prove it to be notable through those sources I've got no reason to continue the AfD.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, fair enough. Usually when dealing with video game character cases like these we get editors that rush in, go "Keep!" and then never improve it again or plan to. It's pleasant to hear that isn't the case here, consider the AfD withdrawn.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno yet, if I do it'll be after I get done with the CMLL titles.  MPJ-DK  (No Drama) Talk  06:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 19:39, 12 September 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.[reply]

Looks good. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 10:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to say? You asked me what I think, I told you. Not seeing a problem here. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 10:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will, I personally see the fact we don't spend as much time talking as we did as a good thing. Most of our conversations were about topics completely unrelated to wikipedia, and as I've said before I simply don't have the time for that anymore - not when I'm on wikipedia. This isn't a social networking site, if I want to chat about random topics I'd go on messenger or to a forum. Since my editing time during the week is going to be limited to about half an hour a day, if I'm lucky, starting on Wednesday I'd rather spend my time keeping an eye on articles, rather than chatting about music/religion/whatever other random topics we've covered in the past. I'm sorry, but that's how it is. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no time, as I've said before. I have one more article to do for a topic with 'Blue, and then I'm taking a break from GAs/GTs/any nominations until next summer. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 22:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Thanks for informing me. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the offer, but I can assure you that, even in the highly unlikely scenario that I magically find time, I have no intention of undertaking the task of getting an article to GA until at least next June. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:59, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well since I have three nominated now, and another one to complete with 'Blue this weekend, you'll just have to deal with it. :) Have a nice day. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to be "snippy". Apologies if it came off that way - I'm a little pushed for time at the moment, and I'm not thinking my comments through a great deal. I think we should just end this conversation to avoid any more misunderstandings. Again, sorry and enjoy the rest of your day. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean right around the time real life problems and situations meant I became too busy to have long-winded conversations about random topics? Yes, I've made it a point to attempt to keep my posts on topic and refrain from rambling conversations that aren't directly related to wikipedia. At this point, it is a necessity to get any article work done at all during the weekdays. After all, that is why we're here. Article work to build an encyclopedia. I'll be honest, I'm not in the mood to have you dissect my motives for trying to be to the point, and maybe being concise than I was say a year or even six months ago. I'm sorry you feel that this is a problem, and I suppose the best way to solve it would be to end this conversation. Once again, have a nice day. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just dropping a line im gonna nominate WWE Cyber Sunday (2008) as a good article is this a good nomination and i wanna work on something got any ideas? and rate my Userpage And Sign My Guestbook please thank you BigPadresDude 18:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:TNA Bound for Glory/GA1 for more information. Chris (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Chris (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. It passed. BTW, this is my first article I have reviewed that I have had pass for GA. Chris (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Will, you have 3 unanswered questions over there. Try to answer them before the election starts (about 24 hours away), please. iMatthew ^talk at 00:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, again I'm concerned that you view it as "winning." Anyway, I'm being completely honest in my rationale. No grudge whatsoever was put into writing that, I wrote it based off of your answered. iMatthew ^talk at 00:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I notice you have apologized for leaving a comment there that you didn't attend to. There is no need to apologize, you can just strike your comment out if you aren't going to write anything there. Just a suggestion. Thanks for your time though, and it is really unfortunate that you weren't able to review the article. Regards! (SUDUSER)₈₅ 03:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for your review. I've fixed two of your changes and have some comments for you at the FLC page. Cheers. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 13:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed your changes but i have addressed something about the image. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 07:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I sounded like I was nagging and much thanks for your support. (SUDUSER)₈₅ 15:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man. How was TNA Impact this week? Save Us.Y2J 12:29, September 19 2009 (UTC)