Template talk:Gbmapping: Difference between revisions
→Not working: ok now |
Odd inaccuracy? |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:looks ok on Leeds Country way from here. [[User:Pit-yacker|Pit-yacker]] ([[User talk:Pit-yacker|talk]]) 19:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
:looks ok on Leeds Country way from here. [[User:Pit-yacker|Pit-yacker]] ([[User talk:Pit-yacker|talk]]) 19:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, for me too - but was definitely playing up last night! Thanks for looking at it. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 00:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
::Yes, for me too - but was definitely playing up last night! Thanks for looking at it. [[User:PamD|PamD]] ([[User talk:PamD|talk]]) 00:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Odd inaccuracy== |
|||
Following the link for <nowiki>{{gbmapping|SO40442450}}</nowiki>, {{gbmapping|SO40442450}} takes me to [http://stable.toolserver.org/geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Template_talk%3AGbmapping¶ms=51.915874531785_N_-2.8672768351309_E_region%3AGB_scale%3A25000 http://stable.toolserver.org/geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Template_talk%3AGbmapping¶ms=51.915874531785_N_-2.8672768351309_E_region%3AGB_scale%3A25000] which includes ''SO4035524553 (all-numeric format: 340356 224553) on the British national grid reference system''. Surely SO40442450 should map to SO4044024500, shouldn't it? --[[User:Cavrdg|Cavrdg]] ([[User talk:Cavrdg|talk]]) 18:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:13, 27 July 2009
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]Templates creating links to a Map sources page
All of these templates create a link to a "Map sources" page, using the British Ordnance Survey National Grid:
| Input | Output |
|---|---|
{{gbmapping|SU 616 687}}
|
grid reference SU 616 687 |
{{gbmapping|cap=1|SU 616 687}}
|
Grid reference SU 616 687 |
{{gbmappingsmall|SU616687}}
|
SU616687 |
{{gbmappingsmall|SU 616 687}}
|
SU 616 687 |
{{gbmappingsmall|SU 616 687|name=Ufton Lock}}
|
SU 616 687 |
{{gbmaprim|SU 616 687|Ufton Lock}}
|
Ufton Lock |
{{gbmapscaled|SU616687|200|editor-selectable scale}}
|
editor-selectable scale |
{{oscoor gbx|461600_168700}}
|
|
The "prim" part of "gbmaprim" stands for primitive—gbmapping calls gbmaprim to actually create the link.
Named arguments
|name=a title for the location on the GeoHack page, also used by {{GeoGroup}}
Templates creating direct links to specific websites
These templates are provided for any editor who wishes to illustrate a particular point being made in an article, they should not be used as a replacement for a map sources link. If you use them:
- please provide a link to the map sources page as well somewhere in the article
- be aware that the external link may change or may look different to someone else, e.g. multimap comes up at different sizes.
| Input | Output |
|---|---|
{{Bing GB map link|PE21|0NB}}
|
PE21 0NB (at multimap—useful for railway station articles—but not much else) |
See also
{{Gbmappingsmall}}—version for use in infoboxes (wrapper for{{Ordnance Survey coordinates}});{{iem4ibx}}—direct link for the Irish grid reference system
Not working
This template appears not to be working - leads to a page of random symbols. This applies to the examples in the documentation as well as to usage in articles such as Leeds Country Way. Does anyone know whether this is a temporary glitch, or whether the template is defunct? It is transcluded in a lot of articles - certainly 500+, didn't look beyond that. PamD (talk) 22:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- looks ok on Leeds Country way from here. Pit-yacker (talk) 19:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, for me too - but was definitely playing up last night! Thanks for looking at it. PamD (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Odd inaccuracy
Following the link for {{gbmapping|SO40442450}}, grid reference SO40442450 takes me to http://stable.toolserver.org/geohack/geohack.php?pagename=Template_talk%3AGbmapping¶ms=51.915874531785_N_-2.8672768351309_E_region%3AGB_scale%3A25000 which includes SO4035524553 (all-numeric format: 340356 224553) on the British national grid reference system. Surely SO40442450 should map to SO4044024500, shouldn't it? --Cavrdg (talk) 18:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)